Discussion:
OT: Cat Question (Warning - Gross Details)
(too old to reply)
Vaney
2004-10-04 21:41:42 UTC
Permalink
Greetings!

I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
Thanks in advance,
Corri
to email, simplify...

"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Dale
2004-10-04 21:55:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***).
*Snipped*

We've got the same problem with Hocus - he's about 9 - 10 years old,
came from a broken home where he was treated badly, eats very quickly,
vomits every day and has fluid stools. We took him to the vet who gave
him antibiotics, which helped a lot, and said that it was either a bowel
infection or Irritable/Inflamatory bowel syndrome. We've had him on
simple diets, light foods, but it doesn't make a difference. He's even
been on steroids.

We've resigned ourselves to the fact that there isn't anything else we
can do for him except make sure that his food isn't too rich, only give
him half a pouch (I think tinned food is evil) at a time, spreading it
out during the day, and that he has lots of water to drink.

He's a happy cat, just barfs and has a smelly litter tray. :)
--
Dale - Liverpool, England

A menace to society - apparently!

Spam block: Please don't mail me with "abuse" - use my name instead!
Lady Nina
2004-10-04 22:56:03 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:41:42 CST, ***@aol.complicated (Vaney)
wrote:

<probably taking bait from a troll but what the hell>
Post by Vaney
I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome.
If you're valuing possessions more than living things then your
priorities are skewed IMO.

Cats throw up from time to time. Deal with it. If it is a regular
thing then get the vet to check it out.

If you must have 'nice' things then keep them in a room that the cats
are not allowed in.

<sighs>
--
Lady Nina
Wonders about large sections of humanity at times.

ZXR400 CG125 3 days.
Vaney
2004-10-05 17:30:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lady Nina
<probably taking bait from a troll but what the hell>
No, I'm not a troll, just a longtime lurker and sometime poster who thought to
ask cat-people a question.
Post by Lady Nina
If you're valuing possessions more than living things then your
priorities are skewed IMO.
Well <sigh> I love my kitties very much. It's just exasperating to come home
every other day to barf on the sofa, the bed, the new carpet, etc etc. I
didn't say I was going to kill the creature.
Post by Lady Nina
Cats throw up from time to time. Deal with it. If it is a regular
thing then get the vet to check it out.
I've had cats for 44 years (I'm 44). I know they throw up. I've taken her to
the vet and he just shakes his head and says, Get used to it, some cats do it.
Hey, if that's really how it is, I can manage.
Post by Lady Nina
If you must have 'nice' things then keep them in a room that the cats
are not allowed in.
My house is less than 600 square feet big. I have two rooms, a kitchen and a
bath. There isn't much area that they don't inhabit with me.

Anyway, thanks to everyone who gave me advice.

Corri
to email, simplify...

"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Baird Stafford
2004-10-05 18:09:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Post by Lady Nina
<probably taking bait from a troll but what the hell>
No, I'm not a troll, just a longtime lurker and sometime poster who thought to
ask cat-people a question.
I should like to point out that alt.religion.wicca.moderated is called
"moderated" for a reason - and that we of the Modstaff do take seriously
the effort to keep trolls on the other side of the fence. When an
article like Vaney's makes it to the newsgroup, it is because one or
another of us has decided that the poster is *not* a troll - and, were I
the kind to take umbrage at every possible slight posted on usenet
against me or my associates, I would at this point be in a high dudgeon.

In point of fact, I, personally, get just the tiniest little bit tired
of the automatic, *posted* assumption that anyone unfamiliar who posts
an article that is even the slightest bit off the beaten path (or "out
of the usual rut," which is the way I first phrased it in my own mind)
must, automatically and by definition, be a troll.

<snip>

Blessed be,
Baird
Lady Nina
2004-10-05 19:10:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baird Stafford
Post by Vaney
Post by Lady Nina
<probably taking bait from a troll but what the hell>
No, I'm not a troll, just a longtime lurker and sometime poster who thought to
ask cat-people a question.
I should like to point out that alt.religion.wicca.moderated is called
"moderated" for a reason - and that we of the Modstaff do take seriously
the effort to keep trolls on the other side of the fence.
Acknowledged. I was here when the last spat from the poster who likes
to stir happened. All the modstaff gave it serious thought and made a
well reasoned decision.
Post by Baird Stafford
When an
article like Vaney's makes it to the newsgroup, it is because one or
another of us has decided that the poster is *not* a troll
And clearly isn't from the follow up. However this

" I'm getting to the point where I'm beginning to value the mean
barfing cat a bit less than my nice new rug (and new down comforter,
could you imagine????)"

on a group such as arwm, where respect for living beings rather than
objects ime is a feature of the thinking of posters here, set alarm
bells ringing.
Post by Baird Stafford
- and, were I
the kind to take umbrage at every possible slight
No slight intended to the mod staff and apologies for any
inadvertently given - I hadn't even thought about the fact it would
have had to come through moderation - you all do your jobs so well I
sometimes forget you are there. <g>
Post by Baird Stafford
posted on usenet
against me or my associates, I would at this point be in a high dudgeon.
That I'd like to see, only not aimed in my general direction <g>
Post by Baird Stafford
In point of fact, I, personally, get just the tiniest little bit tired
of the automatic, *posted* assumption
I tend to say it if I think it.
Post by Baird Stafford
that anyone unfamiliar
True, the unfamiliarity (I've only been in these parts a few months)
coupled with the specific sentiment, as above, seemed odd for an arwm
post.
Post by Baird Stafford
who posts
an article that is even the slightest bit off the beaten path (or "out
of the usual rut," which is the way I first phrased it in my own mind)
I found (and still find) the sentiment expressed above abhorrent to
me.
Post by Baird Stafford
must, automatically and by definition, be a troll.
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
--
Lady Nina
Vaney
2004-10-06 05:26:32 UTC
Permalink
Lady Nina spake thusly:

Vane: I'm getting to the point where I'm beginning to value the mean
barfing cat a bit less than my nice new rug (and new down comforter,
could you imagine????)"
Post by Lady Nina
I found (and still find) the sentiment expressed above abhorrent to
me.
Like I said, I'm not going to have her put down, or sent to an Amish farm, or
anything like that...

Just to be clear, I have an almost obsessive care for living things and the
Mother Earth around me (just ask anyone who has seen me heroically capture
enormous spiders in a tissue and put them outdoors, or dote on my Guardfish
Albert, who lives and eats in a "crick" next to my house).

A little amusing anecdote: some time ago, the Boyfriend called, sounding
rather abrupt, saying that there was a bat in his bedroom and "you need to come
up here and do something..." Well, I went up to his house, and there was the
bat, swooping gracefully around but clearly wanting to be anywhere else. The
more-amusing sight was the Boyfriend, standing there starkers, swopping around
with something and positioned so as to protect the Precious from whatever awful
fate awaited. <guffaw> Anyway, I got a towel, timed the swooping as well as I
could, and gently swatted the little beast on one of it's circuits. It landed
on the (well-padded-and-carpeted) floor, and I went and gathered the little
thing up, told the Boyfriend to go back to bed, and I took little Bat out on
the balcony. It was somewhat stupefied from it's experience, and I sat out
there for about a half-hour, soothing, calming and finally letting it move
about on my hand until it felt like it was Back to Normal. Then I simply hung
it on the side of the house (log home) and went home. It was one of the truly
sublime experiences of my life, so close to the little being, so quiet, so
patient until Little Bat was ready to go. And no, I wasn't worried about
rabies. The little thing was really pretty helpless.

I just want to reiterate that I have no desire to "off" the mean barfing cat.
I'm just exasperated and tired of the excess mess. I did get some good
advice...She goes out now, almost all day, and the exercise might be helping
(Holy Moley! Yes! She has claws! She can defend herself! She kills rabbits
and frogs whenever possible (no, no evidence of rabbit or frog entrails in the
barf) No, I see no comparison between the Cat killing without compunction and
me contemplating freedom from barf...)

Seriously, thanks for all the advice. I can't *imagine* what the cats are
going to say when the always-available kibble disappears.....

Corri


to email, simplify...

"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Dale
2004-10-06 12:33:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Seriously, thanks for all the advice. I can't *imagine* what the cats are
going to say when the always-available kibble disappears.....
"Meoo-ow"?
--
Dale - Liverpool, England

A menace to society - apparently!

Spam block: Please don't mail me with "abuse" - use my name instead!
Tiliqua
2004-10-07 02:58:33 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Vaney's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Vaney
I just want to reiterate that I have no desire to "off" the mean barfing cat.
I'm just exasperated and tired of the excess mess. I did get some good
advice...She goes out now, almost all day, and the exercise might be helping
(Holy Moley! Yes! She has claws! She can defend herself! She kills rabbits
and frogs whenever possible (no, no evidence of rabbit or frog entrails in the
barf) No, I see no comparison between the Cat killing without compunction and
me contemplating freedom from barf...)
My experience is that they'll leave the entrails and head SOMEWHERE!
You may find them or you may have to sniff them out later. At least
they're not bringing their trophies back into the loungeroom to
present to you and claim praise for being SUCH a mighty hunter (Little
Nimrod)
Post by Vaney
Seriously, thanks for all the advice. I can't *imagine* what the cats are
going to say when the always-available kibble disappears.....
Be glad you don't have a Universal Translator.

The language will be bad, they'll be fainting away from starvation too
("Look Mum, RIBS!! I have RIBS! I shouldn't have ribs - all the others
don't have ribs, why do I have to have ribs, Mum!"), they'll claw at
your calves to get your attention and sing tales of woe at you for
weeks.
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Yowie
2004-10-07 03:36:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Vaney
I just want to reiterate that I have no desire to "off" the mean barfing cat.
I'm just exasperated and tired of the excess mess. I did get some good
advice...She goes out now, almost all day, and the exercise might be helping
(Holy Moley! Yes! She has claws! She can defend herself! She kills rabbits
and frogs whenever possible (no, no evidence of rabbit or frog entrails in the
barf) No, I see no comparison between the Cat killing without compunction and
me contemplating freedom from barf...)
My experience is that they'll leave the entrails and head SOMEWHERE!
You may find them or you may have to sniff them out later. At least
they're not bringing their trophies back into the loungeroom to
present to you and claim praise for being SUCH a mighty hunter (Little
Nimrod)
Post by Vaney
Seriously, thanks for all the advice. I can't *imagine* what the cats are
going to say when the always-available kibble disappears.....
Be glad you don't have a Universal Translator.
The language will be bad, they'll be fainting away from starvation too
("Look Mum, RIBS!! I have RIBS! I shouldn't have ribs - all the others
don't have ribs, why do I have to have ribs, Mum!"), they'll claw at
your calves to get your attention and sing tales of woe at you for
weeks.
You could of course be truly evil and <shock horror> just put kibble down
they flatly refuse to eat [ie, anything thats currenlty cheaper than the
stuff you usually give them, even if its otherwise the same darn stuff]. So
when they do the starving much put-upon waif thing, you can righteously
point to the full bowl of kibble and say "well, its not *my* fault you won't
eat your food".

Then again, all true cat staff know you can't out-stubborn a cat.

Best of luck with it, anyway.

Yowie
Brock Ulfsen
2004-10-11 13:16:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lady Nina
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)

Harm None doesn't mean Jainist sweeping of each footprint to remove
insects it means minimising harm and accepting consequences of ones actions.

...Brock.
Yowie
2004-10-13 01:35:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Post by Lady Nina
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
perhaps us Aussies (and Kiwis) are liekly to have a different view on stray
and feral cats than people of places where cat-like carnivores are part of
the natural ecology.

I am a cat owner, but my kitty will never be responsible for killing Aussie
fauna. He did manage to snag a small rat or large mouse once, but niether of
those are native, and the critter had come indoors (I don't let my cat
outside). Whilst I wish *stray* cats (ie, the domesticated variety that have
found themselves humanless) another happy home, I agree the quickest, most
humane and most economical way to deal with the generational *feral* cats
that are decimating our wildlife is a sudden and immediatley fatal shot to
the head.

Yowie
Tiliqua
2004-10-13 06:10:35 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Yowie's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Yowie
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Post by Lady Nina
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
perhaps us Aussies (and Kiwis) are liekly to have a different view on stray
and feral cats than people of places where cat-like carnivores are part of
the natural ecology.
I am a cat owner, but my kitty will never be responsible for killing Aussie
fauna. He did manage to snag a small rat or large mouse once, but niether of
those are native, and the critter had come indoors (I don't let my cat
outside). Whilst I wish *stray* cats (ie, the domesticated variety that have
found themselves humanless) another happy home, I agree the quickest, most
humane and most economical way to deal with the generational *feral* cats
that are decimating our wildlife is a sudden and immediatley fatal shot to
the head.
Yowie
And there'll be no argument from me against either point of view.

I do wish that there was some device which allowed one the chance to
scan for an ID chip from a long distance (maybe 200m) before one fired
(to reduce the chances of knocking off a beloved companion who was
just away from its carers by mischance) but until that's available,
then Brock's solution (as first espoused by Dr John Walmsley) is
ultimately for the good of the nation.

Because I live in suburbia (albeit fairly bushy), Oscar (the Glossiest
Cat in the Galaxy) *is* allowed out during daylight hours (because
most of the native prey animals are nocturnal themselves) but I bring
him into the house at dusk before they come out.

--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Shez
2004-10-13 11:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Yowie
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Post by Lady Nina
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
perhaps us Aussies (and Kiwis) are liekly to have a different view on stray
and feral cats than people of places where cat-like carnivores are part of
the natural ecology.
I am a cat owner, but my kitty will never be responsible for killing Aussie
fauna. He did manage to snag a small rat or large mouse once, but niether of
those are native, and the critter had come indoors (I don't let my cat
outside). Whilst I wish *stray* cats (ie, the domesticated variety that have
found themselves humanless) another happy home, I agree the quickest, most
humane and most economical way to deal with the generational *feral* cats
that are decimating our wildlife is a sudden and immediatley fatal shot to
the head.
Yowie
And there'll be no argument from me against either point of view.
I do wish that there was some device which allowed one the chance to
scan for an ID chip from a long distance (maybe 200m) before one fired
(to reduce the chances of knocking off a beloved companion who was
just away from its carers by mischance) but until that's available,
then Brock's solution (as first espoused by Dr John Walmsley) is
ultimately for the good of the nation.
Because I live in suburbia (albeit fairly bushy), Oscar (the Glossiest
Cat in the Galaxy) *is* allowed out during daylight hours (because
most of the native prey animals are nocturnal themselves) but I bring
him into the house at dusk before they come out.
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
I suppose the most obvious answer is to require that all male cats have
a vasectomy, But that is impossible to police if you have a huge feral
cat population... In the end if they are decimating the wild life, then
you have to consider the ecology before an imported animal, if shooting
is the only way then it has to be that way... Once the ecology was
decimated the cat population would fall anyway because their would no
longer be the food available, and Australia would lose its wildlife
which is not an answer.
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Tiliqua
2004-10-14 08:19:01 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Shez's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Shez
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Yowie
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Post by Lady Nina
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
perhaps us Aussies (and Kiwis) are liekly to have a different view on stray
and feral cats than people of places where cat-like carnivores are part of
the natural ecology.
I am a cat owner, but my kitty will never be responsible for killing Aussie
fauna. He did manage to snag a small rat or large mouse once, but niether of
those are native, and the critter had come indoors (I don't let my cat
outside). Whilst I wish *stray* cats (ie, the domesticated variety that have
found themselves humanless) another happy home, I agree the quickest, most
humane and most economical way to deal with the generational *feral* cats
that are decimating our wildlife is a sudden and immediatley fatal shot to
the head.
Yowie
And there'll be no argument from me against either point of view.
I do wish that there was some device which allowed one the chance to
scan for an ID chip from a long distance (maybe 200m) before one fired
(to reduce the chances of knocking off a beloved companion who was
just away from its carers by mischance) but until that's available,
then Brock's solution (as first espoused by Dr John Walmsley) is
ultimately for the good of the nation.
Because I live in suburbia (albeit fairly bushy), Oscar (the Glossiest
Cat in the Galaxy) *is* allowed out during daylight hours (because
most of the native prey animals are nocturnal themselves) but I bring
him into the house at dusk before they come out.
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
I suppose the most obvious answer is to require that all male cats have
a vasectomy,
In some shires (mine included), de-sexing, vaccination and ID chipping
is required before the animal can be purchased. (I know this doesn't
address the cats who breed in the barns and their genetic line never
HAS been registered, but it's a start.)
Post by Shez
But that is impossible to police if you have a huge feral
cat population... In the end if they are decimating the wild life, then
you have to consider the ecology before an imported animal, if shooting
is the only way then it has to be that way... Once the ecology was
decimated the cat population would fall anyway because their would no
longer be the food available, and Australia would lose its wildlife
which is not an answer.
There are also considerations that (at least in the Far North) genetic
tracing has shown a completely different line of feline descent,
dating back to before Europeans arrived in Oz. It's thought that the
"Indonesians" (Moluccans, Timorese, Javanese) who fished those waters,
interbred with the locals and brought their own food animals (cats and
dogs included) sometimes let them escape and so the cat population in
the North has some claim to "native" status, dating back several
millennia (about 3000 BCE is the most recent date I've heard). Some of
those wild cats are the epitome of healthy, hardy, fast, big and
completely independent beasts, weighing in at more than a three-year
old child (say 30Kg). They are admirable hunting beasts.

I wouldn't want to be injured if one of them is nearby and hungry!!

However, they've not yet interbred with the Southern, later, European
imported cats.
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Shez
2004-10-14 13:26:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Shez
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Yowie
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Post by Lady Nina
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
perhaps us Aussies (and Kiwis) are liekly to have a different view on stray
and feral cats than people of places where cat-like carnivores are part of
the natural ecology.
I am a cat owner, but my kitty will never be responsible for killing Aussie
fauna. He did manage to snag a small rat or large mouse once, but niether of
those are native, and the critter had come indoors (I don't let my cat
outside). Whilst I wish *stray* cats (ie, the domesticated variety that have
found themselves humanless) another happy home, I agree the quickest, most
humane and most economical way to deal with the generational *feral* cats
that are decimating our wildlife is a sudden and immediatley fatal shot to
the head.
Yowie
And there'll be no argument from me against either point of view.
I do wish that there was some device which allowed one the chance to
scan for an ID chip from a long distance (maybe 200m) before one fired
(to reduce the chances of knocking off a beloved companion who was
just away from its carers by mischance) but until that's available,
then Brock's solution (as first espoused by Dr John Walmsley) is
ultimately for the good of the nation.
Because I live in suburbia (albeit fairly bushy), Oscar (the Glossiest
Cat in the Galaxy) *is* allowed out during daylight hours (because
most of the native prey animals are nocturnal themselves) but I bring
him into the house at dusk before they come out.
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
I suppose the most obvious answer is to require that all male cats have
a vasectomy,
In some shires (mine included), de-sexing, vaccination and ID chipping
is required before the animal can be purchased. (I know this doesn't
address the cats who breed in the barns and their genetic line never
HAS been registered, but it's a start.)
Post by Shez
But that is impossible to police if you have a huge feral
cat population... In the end if they are decimating the wild life, then
you have to consider the ecology before an imported animal, if shooting
is the only way then it has to be that way... Once the ecology was
decimated the cat population would fall anyway because their would no
longer be the food available, and Australia would lose its wildlife
which is not an answer.
There are also considerations that (at least in the Far North) genetic
tracing has shown a completely different line of feline descent,
dating back to before Europeans arrived in Oz. It's thought that the
"Indonesians" (Moluccans, Timorese, Javanese) who fished those waters,
interbred with the locals and brought their own food animals (cats and
dogs included) sometimes let them escape and so the cat population in
the North has some claim to "native" status, dating back several
millennia (about 3000 BCE is the most recent date I've heard). Some of
those wild cats are the epitome of healthy, hardy, fast, big and
completely independent beasts, weighing in at more than a three-year
old child (say 30Kg). They are admirable hunting beasts.
I wouldn't want to be injured if one of them is nearby and hungry!!
However, they've not yet interbred with the Southern, later, European
imported cats.
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
Post by Tiliqua
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Yowie
2004-10-15 02:20:05 UTC
Permalink
"Shez" <***@oldcity.f2s.com> wrote in message news:JbPObYCy$***@oldcity.f2s.com...

<snippity>
Post by Shez
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
Australia may well want to hang onto that genetic line for studying and/or
breeding purposes, but since its arrival, although "ancient" by our human
standards is still extremely recent in terms of the other wildlife evolving
coping strategies, it also needs to be eradicated from the wild.

Yowie
Nuala
2004-10-15 19:30:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yowie
<snippity>
Post by Shez
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
Australia may well want to hang onto that genetic line for studying
and/or breeding purposes, but since its arrival, although "ancient" by
our human standards is still extremely recent in terms of the other
wildlife evolving coping strategies, it also needs to be eradicated from
the wild.
But life tends to do that anyway. It has a way of refusing to be
contained. Perhaps this is a case of 'Where do we draw the boundary?' said
she warily, knowing f-all about Australasian wildlife.

~Love and blessings~
--
"Don't worry, us witches will always be alright, dear.
Remember, we happen to other people."
- Nanny Ogg
Tiliqua
2004-10-16 08:39:40 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Nuala's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Nuala
Post by Yowie
<snippity>
Post by Shez
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
Australia may well want to hang onto that genetic line for studying
and/or breeding purposes, but since its arrival, although "ancient" by
our human standards is still extremely recent in terms of the other
wildlife evolving coping strategies, it also needs to be eradicated from
the wild.
But life tends to do that anyway. It has a way of refusing to be
contained. Perhaps this is a case of 'Where do we draw the boundary?' said
she warily, knowing f-all about Australasian wildlife.
That was at least partly the motivation for my posting the information
in the first place. I agree we're faced with the question, "Just
what's FERAL, anyway?". I don't have any answers and I'm not sure that
attempting to eradicate ALL the cats is the right idea, especially in
the Far North as I said before.

Foxes and wild dogs, on the other hand, MUST go!!
Post by Nuala
~Love and blessings~
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Nuala
2004-10-17 19:00:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
[snip]
Post by Tiliqua
Post by Nuala
But life tends to do that anyway. It has a way of refusing to be
contained. Perhaps this is a case of 'Where do we draw the boundary?'
said she warily, knowing f-all about Australasian wildlife.
That was at least partly the motivation for my posting the information
in the first place. I agree we're faced with the question, "Just what's
FERAL, anyway?". I don't have any answers and I'm not sure that
attempting to eradicate ALL the cats is the right idea, especially in
the Far North as I said before.
Foxes and wild dogs, on the other hand, MUST go!!
Yes. Well. Good luck with that then. :)

But seriously, Nature has always used each and every avenue open to Her,
including using Humankind, to add new things into the mix. Cats have
always travelled with us on ships, dogs have emigrated with settlers, and
so forth, and then some of these animals inevitably escaped to found
colonies in the same way as the humans who brought them.

It's just, well, I have visions of us trying to put the genie back in
the bottle.

~Love and blessings~
--
'I used to live in a darkened room
Had a face of stone and a heart of gloom
Lost my hope, I was so far gone
Crying all my tears with the curtains drawn'
Tiliqua
2004-10-19 05:15:02 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Shez's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that

(much snippage)
Post by Tiliqua
There are also considerations that (at least in the Far North) genetic
Post by Tiliqua
tracing has shown a completely different line of feline descent,
dating back to before Europeans arrived in Oz. It's thought that the
"Indonesians" (Moluccans, Timorese, Javanese) who fished those waters,
interbred with the locals and brought their own food animals (cats and
dogs included) sometimes let them escape and so the cat population in
the North has some claim to "native" status, dating back several
millennia (about 3000 BCE is the most recent date I've heard). Some of
those wild cats are the epitome of healthy, hardy, fast, big and
completely independent beasts, weighing in at more than a three-year
old child (say 30Kg). They are admirable hunting beasts.
I wouldn't want to be injured if one of them is nearby and hungry!!
However, they've not yet interbred with the Southern, later, European
imported cats.
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
The closest equivalent are the domesticated cheetahs which used to be
kept as hunting cats by the various Middle Eastern sultans, sheiks and
what-have-you.

Ours aren't quite so long-legged or fast (without looking like
daschunds, either!), but the body-weight is about the same.

It's great to watch them stalking they're just so graceful and
generally admirable, but they _have_ to be culled out.
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Shez
2004-10-19 11:52:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
(much snippage)
Post by Tiliqua
There are also considerations that (at least in the Far North) genetic
Post by Tiliqua
tracing has shown a completely different line of feline descent,
dating back to before Europeans arrived in Oz. It's thought that the
"Indonesians" (Moluccans, Timorese, Javanese) who fished those waters,
interbred with the locals and brought their own food animals (cats and
dogs included) sometimes let them escape and so the cat population in
the North has some claim to "native" status, dating back several
millennia (about 3000 BCE is the most recent date I've heard). Some of
those wild cats are the epitome of healthy, hardy, fast, big and
completely independent beasts, weighing in at more than a three-year
old child (say 30Kg). They are admirable hunting beasts.
I wouldn't want to be injured if one of them is nearby and hungry!!
However, they've not yet interbred with the Southern, later, European
imported cats.
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
The closest equivalent are the domesticated cheetahs which used to be
kept as hunting cats by the various Middle Eastern sultans, sheiks and
what-have-you.
Ours aren't quite so long-legged or fast (without looking like
daschunds, either!), but the body-weight is about the same.
It's great to watch them stalking they're just so graceful and
generally admirable, but they _have_ to be culled out.
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Pity they sound beautiful, but Australia's wildlife is so unique that if
that is all that would save it, then it has to be.
The problem is cats look beautiful, if they looked like rats or
crocodiles no one would turn a hair, but they are lovely elegant, and
charming killing machines.
That is their function, they cant help being what they are, but in a
place like Australia they are out of place and destructive.
We had a plague in Norfolk of coypu imported for their fur, and gone
wild, they nearly destroyed Norfolk's delicate waterways and broads...
they had to put a huge price on every coypu tail and they were hunted to
extinction about twenty years ago, They were lovely animals, but they
were destroying a a whole wetlands system and would have impacted in the
end on the whole country as they spread.
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Tiliqua
2004-10-20 06:13:29 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Shez's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Shez
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
(much snippage)
Post by Tiliqua
There are also considerations that (at least in the Far North) genetic
Post by Tiliqua
tracing has shown a completely different line of feline descent,
dating back to before Europeans arrived in Oz. It's thought that the
"Indonesians" (Moluccans, Timorese, Javanese) who fished those waters,
interbred with the locals and brought their own food animals (cats and
dogs included) sometimes let them escape and so the cat population in
the North has some claim to "native" status, dating back several
millennia (about 3000 BCE is the most recent date I've heard). Some of
those wild cats are the epitome of healthy, hardy, fast, big and
completely independent beasts, weighing in at more than a three-year
old child (say 30Kg). They are admirable hunting beasts.
I wouldn't want to be injured if one of them is nearby and hungry!!
However, they've not yet interbred with the Southern, later, European
imported cats.
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
The closest equivalent are the domesticated cheetahs which used to be
kept as hunting cats by the various Middle Eastern sultans, sheiks and
what-have-you.
Ours aren't quite so long-legged or fast (without looking like
daschunds, either!), but the body-weight is about the same.
It's great to watch them stalking they're just so graceful and
generally admirable, but they _have_ to be culled out.
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Pity they sound beautiful, but Australia's wildlife is so unique that if
that is all that would save it, then it has to be.
The problem is cats look beautiful, if they looked like rats or
crocodiles no one would turn a hair, but they are lovely elegant, and
charming killing machines.
That is their function, they cant help being what they are, but in a
place like Australia they are out of place and destructive.
We had a plague in Norfolk of coypu imported for their fur, and gone
wild, they nearly destroyed Norfolk's delicate waterways and broads...
they had to put a huge price on every coypu tail and they were hunted to
extinction about twenty years ago, They were lovely animals, but they
were destroying a a whole wetlands system and would have impacted in the
end on the whole country as they spread.
While I have heard of the Norfolk Broads and the fen country, I wasn't
aware that you'd had a problem with coypus (I think I recall them
being mentioned in some of Gerald Durrell's books) and I think that
they were native to South America.

Good eating too, by report (grin).
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Shez
2004-10-20 11:43:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Shez
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
(much snippage)
Post by Tiliqua
There are also considerations that (at least in the Far North) genetic
Post by Tiliqua
tracing has shown a completely different line of feline descent,
dating back to before Europeans arrived in Oz. It's thought that the
"Indonesians" (Moluccans, Timorese, Javanese) who fished those waters,
interbred with the locals and brought their own food animals (cats and
dogs included) sometimes let them escape and so the cat population in
the North has some claim to "native" status, dating back several
millennia (about 3000 BCE is the most recent date I've heard). Some of
those wild cats are the epitome of healthy, hardy, fast, big and
completely independent beasts, weighing in at more than a three-year
old child (say 30Kg). They are admirable hunting beasts.
I wouldn't want to be injured if one of them is nearby and hungry!!
However, they've not yet interbred with the Southern, later, European
imported cats.
That is a big cat by any standards, and no doubt Australia want to hang
on to that genetic line if its part of the wildlife of the bush. I can
well imagine they are great hunters. Cats always are.
The closest equivalent are the domesticated cheetahs which used to be
kept as hunting cats by the various Middle Eastern sultans, sheiks and
what-have-you.
Ours aren't quite so long-legged or fast (without looking like
daschunds, either!), but the body-weight is about the same.
It's great to watch them stalking they're just so graceful and
generally admirable, but they _have_ to be culled out.
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Pity they sound beautiful, but Australia's wildlife is so unique that if
that is all that would save it, then it has to be.
The problem is cats look beautiful, if they looked like rats or
crocodiles no one would turn a hair, but they are lovely elegant, and
charming killing machines.
That is their function, they cant help being what they are, but in a
place like Australia they are out of place and destructive.
We had a plague in Norfolk of coypu imported for their fur, and gone
wild, they nearly destroyed Norfolk's delicate waterways and broads...
they had to put a huge price on every coypu tail and they were hunted to
extinction about twenty years ago, They were lovely animals, but they
were destroying a a whole wetlands system and would have impacted in the
end on the whole country as they spread.
While I have heard of the Norfolk Broads and the fen country, I wasn't
aware that you'd had a problem with coypus (I think I recall them
being mentioned in some of Gerald Durrell's books) and I think that
they were native to South America.
Good eating too, by report (grin).
I didnt know about the eating, and Yes I beleive they came from South
America... they were quite large, their is a stuffed one in the local
museum. Most people have forgotten what a fuss was made, and how much
damage was done by the coypu to fragile river and broad ( shallow lakes
) banks, the wetlands of Norfolk are incredibly fragile, and one of the
few places left in the whole of Europe, so they are of International
significance.. The broads are based on peat, not rock and the stability
of banks is very important, normally reeds, and rushes line the banks
and help to stabilise them, but the coypu was digging holes and eating
the roots of the rushes and reeds. Plus its breeding holes on the river
banks was causing subsidence.
Post by Tiliqua
--
May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Ginger-lyn Summer
2004-10-16 16:27:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brock Ulfsen
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
Harm None doesn't mean Jainist sweeping of each footprint to remove
insects it means minimising harm and accepting consequences of ones actions.
...Brock.
I have to say that I am more than a bit surprised and horrified to see
such opinions expressed here. Many Wiccans are cat lovers, and some
(like myself) worship Bast. This, and some of the other comments
here, are very offensive to me, and to my Deity, and I am surprised to
see such lack of regard for life expressed in what has always been a
very intelligent group. It's particularly upsetting to me to see
comments about shooting feral cats proferred by posters whom I greatly
respect and even love, and I am so depressed by these comments, I woke
up today in tears and unable to get back to sleep.

I tried to ignore this thread, but obviously, I couldn't. I have
eight beloved cats, one of whom is a former feral. When I look into
his beautiful eyes, and then read some of the comments on this thread,
I am heartbroken. I know little about Australian ferals, but I can
tell you that there are many in the US who have the same attitude
about ferals here, and who actively shoot/poison/run over/whatever
feral cats. It breaks my heart.

Ginger-lyn
deeply saddened
Alan Young
2004-10-16 20:04:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Brock Ulfsen
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
Harm None doesn't mean Jainist sweeping of each footprint to remove
insects it means minimising harm and accepting consequences of ones actions.
...Brock.
I have to say that I am more than a bit surprised and horrified to see
such opinions expressed here. Many Wiccans are cat lovers, and some
(like myself) worship Bast. This, and some of the other comments
here, are very offensive to me, and to my Deity, and I am surprised to
see such lack of regard for life expressed in what has always been a
very intelligent group.
Context is everything, in this case.

I was just reading up on the natural history of New Zealand. There was
an account of an island where, a century or so ago, the only
inhabitants were a rare flightless bird (I don't recall what it was
called). A lighthouse was installed there, and a man came to live there
to keep the lighthouse, with only a cat for company. A decade later,
the birds were extinct: the cat had killed every one of them, as they
had no defenses against predators.

Regard for life as an overall fabric is the essence of love. But the
fabric can't survive without death. Knowing the proper proportions is
essential. I love cats, but feral cats in most places, and even
domestic cats in some places (as shown by the above example), are a
threat to that fabric.
--
Hummingbear

Just as intellects are bewildered by my madness,
I am bewildered by the frozen state of these intellects.
Because in this path,
anything other than confusion and madness
is distance and alienation from God.

--Rumi,
translated by Coleman Barks
Shez
2004-10-16 21:15:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Brock Ulfsen
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
Harm None doesn't mean Jainist sweeping of each footprint to remove
insects it means minimising harm and accepting consequences of ones actions.
...Brock.
I have to say that I am more than a bit surprised and horrified to see
such opinions expressed here. Many Wiccans are cat lovers, and some
(like myself) worship Bast. This, and some of the other comments
here, are very offensive to me, and to my Deity, and I am surprised to
see such lack of regard for life expressed in what has always been a
very intelligent group. It's particularly upsetting to me to see
comments about shooting feral cats proferred by posters whom I greatly
respect and even love, and I am so depressed by these comments, I woke
up today in tears and unable to get back to sleep.
I tried to ignore this thread, but obviously, I couldn't. I have
eight beloved cats, one of whom is a former feral. When I look into
his beautiful eyes, and then read some of the comments on this thread,
I am heartbroken. I know little about Australian ferals, but I can
tell you that there are many in the US who have the same attitude
about ferals here, and who actively shoot/poison/run over/whatever
feral cats. It breaks my heart.
Ginger-lyn
deeply saddened
I think most of us Ginger would prefer a better solution, but their
isn't one, Feral cats are a problem in many countries, In countries
where they should never have been introduced they have decimated the
local wildlife, affecting an ecological balance that has taken millions
of years to bring about... I don't want to shoot any animal, but if the
choice is between a whole ecology and feral cats then you have to be
sensible. You have to see the whole picture, not just the bits you want
to see, I suggest you do some web searches on feral cats in Australia
and the damage they are doing to the wild life, Don't forget Australia
has a very unique ecology Marsupials are nowhere else in the world in
such abundance... they can not be replaced from another gene pool, or
bred from captive animals from other countries, Once they are gone they
are gone.
I love cats, I have had cats for most of my life, But I can not and will
not put feral cats before the ecology of a whole country. Some things
are more important than our love for a particular type of animal.
I love dogs, I cant understand anyone hurting a dog or a cat for that
matter. But if dogs were running wild killing sheep for instance, as a
good Yorkshire lass I would take a rifle out myself and kill the dog...
I would be heartbroken having to do it, but if you had ever seen sheep
torn up by a dog, or lambs ripped to pieces you would feel differently I
assure you, It doesn't stop me loving dogs, or cats it simply is an
understanding that we all have our place on this earth, and once
something becomes out of place, like Feral cats in Australia, or dogs
killing sheep, you have to stop it happening.
Cats are born hunters, and they often play with their food, leaving it
half dead or maimed... some of the smaller marsupials, bush babies for
instance can be decimated by a cat... Would you feel sorry for the cat
if you came across a tiny bush baby torn to shreds and still alive...
You have to face mother nature eventually, and its tooth and claws as
well as beauty and spirituality.. Their is nothing in this world worse
than refusing to face facts... If as a human race we keep over
populating this planet then we like the dinosaur and like many other
species before us will condemn ourselves. We are part of nature to. And
we need to behave responsibly. Not foolishly.
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Ginger-lyn Summer
2004-10-21 18:05:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Shez
I think most of us Ginger would prefer a better solution, but their
isn't one, Feral cats are a problem in many countries, In countries
where they should never have been introduced they have decimated the
local wildlife, affecting an ecological balance that has taken millions
of years to bring about... I don't want to shoot any animal, but if the
choice is between a whole ecology and feral cats then you have to be
sensible. You have to see the whole picture, not just the bits you want
to see, I suggest you do some web searches on feral cats in Australia
and the damage they are doing to the wild life, Don't forget Australia
has a very unique ecology Marsupials are nowhere else in the world in
such abundance... they can not be replaced from another gene pool, or
bred from captive animals from other countries, Once they are gone they
are gone.
I love cats, I have had cats for most of my life, But I can not and will
not put feral cats before the ecology of a whole country. Some things
are more important than our love for a particular type of animal.
I love dogs, I cant understand anyone hurting a dog or a cat for that
matter. But if dogs were running wild killing sheep for instance, as a
good Yorkshire lass I would take a rifle out myself and kill the dog...
I would be heartbroken having to do it, but if you had ever seen sheep
torn up by a dog, or lambs ripped to pieces you would feel differently I
assure you, It doesn't stop me loving dogs, or cats it simply is an
understanding that we all have our place on this earth, and once
something becomes out of place, like Feral cats in Australia, or dogs
killing sheep, you have to stop it happening.
Cats are born hunters, and they often play with their food, leaving it
half dead or maimed... some of the smaller marsupials, bush babies for
instance can be decimated by a cat... Would you feel sorry for the cat
if you came across a tiny bush baby torn to shreds and still alive...
You have to face mother nature eventually, and its tooth and claws as
well as beauty and spirituality.. Their is nothing in this world worse
than refusing to face facts... If as a human race we keep over
populating this planet then we like the dinosaur and like many other
species before us will condemn ourselves. We are part of nature to. And
we need to behave responsibly. Not foolishly.
--
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
After talking to Yowie on Monday, I have a better understanding of the
background of the problem. That being said, I still cannot agree.

Yes, we need to behave responsibly. It is humans behaving
irresponsibly who have created the problem, and it is up to humans to
fix the problem without making it worse. We have similar things here,
for instance, with deer populations getting out of control. I don't
appreciate setting loose hunters on deer just because we humans have
sprawled into *their* territory anymore than I appreciate shooting
cats. Punishing animals by taking away their lives because *we* have
made a mistake strikes me as terribly wrong.

I took Zoology; I understand something about ecosystems. But
ecosystems *do* change, inevitably. The feral cats may simply be part
of a change of ecosystem, a part of evolution, and may yet have value
to that ecosystem of which we are not yet aware. Sometimes by trying
to solve a problem (particularly taking the easy way out), we humans
make more of a mess of things.

I don't want to see species decimated anywhere, whether it be in the
US or Australia. But I do think there *must* be a better solution to
this. Here in the US, we have groups of caring people who do TNR
(trap, neuter and release), feed and manage feral colonies so they
have no need to feed on local wildlife. I understand, from what Yowie
told me, that this is difficult in Australia since most of the ferals
are in the Outback. It doesn't mean it is impossible. If, instead of
saying "That's just the way it is; accept it" (an argument I always
find fault with, as if we all took that view, we would still be
lynching African-Americans in the American South and women would still
be unable to make decisions affecting their own bodies and lives),
people said "Let's fix this problem in a way that does no harm to the
animals", then we would be doing something positive, both about the
situation and for the ferals.

I will continue to pray to Bast for the protection of ferals
everywhere. They are, after all, Her children, too.

Ginger-lyn
Shez
2004-10-21 21:45:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Shez
I think most of us Ginger would prefer a better solution, but their
isn't one, Feral cats are a problem in many countries, In countries
where they should never have been introduced they have decimated the
local wildlife, affecting an ecological balance that has taken millions
of years to bring about... I don't want to shoot any animal, but if the
choice is between a whole ecology and feral cats then you have to be
sensible. You have to see the whole picture, not just the bits you want
to see, I suggest you do some web searches on feral cats in Australia
and the damage they are doing to the wild life, Don't forget Australia
has a very unique ecology Marsupials are nowhere else in the world in
such abundance... they can not be replaced from another gene pool, or
bred from captive animals from other countries, Once they are gone they
are gone.
I love cats, I have had cats for most of my life, But I can not and will
not put feral cats before the ecology of a whole country. Some things
are more important than our love for a particular type of animal.
I love dogs, I cant understand anyone hurting a dog or a cat for that
matter. But if dogs were running wild killing sheep for instance, as a
good Yorkshire lass I would take a rifle out myself and kill the dog...
I would be heartbroken having to do it, but if you had ever seen sheep
torn up by a dog, or lambs ripped to pieces you would feel differently I
assure you, It doesn't stop me loving dogs, or cats it simply is an
understanding that we all have our place on this earth, and once
something becomes out of place, like Feral cats in Australia, or dogs
killing sheep, you have to stop it happening.
Cats are born hunters, and they often play with their food, leaving it
half dead or maimed... some of the smaller marsupials, bush babies for
instance can be decimated by a cat... Would you feel sorry for the cat
if you came across a tiny bush baby torn to shreds and still alive...
You have to face mother nature eventually, and its tooth and claws as
well as beauty and spirituality.. Their is nothing in this world worse
than refusing to face facts... If as a human race we keep over
populating this planet then we like the dinosaur and like many other
species before us will condemn ourselves. We are part of nature to. And
we need to behave responsibly. Not foolishly.
--
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
After talking to Yowie on Monday, I have a better understanding of the
background of the problem. That being said, I still cannot agree.
Yes, we need to behave responsibly. It is humans behaving
irresponsibly who have created the problem, and it is up to humans to
fix the problem without making it worse. We have similar things here,
for instance, with deer populations getting out of control. I don't
appreciate setting loose hunters on deer just because we humans have
sprawled into *their* territory anymore than I appreciate shooting
cats. Punishing animals by taking away their lives because *we* have
made a mistake strikes me as terribly wrong.
I think that you have the wrong end of the stick their, I don't think
any of us are thinking of punishing cats for being cats, that is their
nature, they are natural hunters and they do what their nature tells
them to do, Feral cats are not a problem in Britain because its a small
island and cats and dogs have to kept in check otherwise we would find
ourselves in competition for food... instead of in partnership in life,
which is a far better answer. If Australia insists that all cats are
kept responsibly, neutered, and cat populations are kept low and in
human habitations then its not a big problem, its when humans don't take
their responsibility to their animals seriously, and let unnutured dogs,
cats and other animals go wild that the problem starts.
I keep in mind always that nature is red in tooth and claw, and our
lives are now so out of joint with nature that people don't know or
really understand where our food comes from, We have become insulated
from nature and the land, If anything ever happens then how many people
could survive, could kill animals for food, would know how to make
cheese butter from scratch could care for farm animals, milk cows, and
sow and reap without all the machinery and power we have today... very
few I think. We are also hunters and killers, we can afford to forget
that in the modern world in the west at least but the rest of the world
doesn't have that sort of choice...
I can kill animals, I can grow food, I can milk cows and goats, make
butter and cheese, bottle food for winter, and dry it, salt it or smoke
it, if I cant bottle it because those skills were still in use when I
was young. I know what it is to harvest vegetables by hand, to stack
corn, or wheat. To spend backbreaking hours picking fruit, or potatoes,
and I do get very irritated with those who will not face up to the very
obvious fact of where our food comes from, and how hard it can be in the
rest of the world to get that food. That those in dire poverty cant
afford to be vegetarian, that cats and dogs are eaten as meat animals in
some countries. That its only in the west you can afford to be a dreamer
and impractical when it comes to the very practical needs of humanity
and of ecology... I doubt if a cat would feel sorry for the mouse its
killing, or a dog would let a rabbit go because the rabbit was cute...
I am a very practical person, I don't have many illusions left. I never
had any illusions about food, it was in short supply when I was young.
Fluffy bunny attitudes about animals do not help the animals in the long
run, they simply make doing a job that must be done all the harder. Deer
need to be kept under control and that means culling, the old and the
weak usually, if they are left to breed without natural predators they
can ruin whole forests and you would end up with wasteland, as they
stripped bark from trees, and killed them.
Unless of course your willing to bring back the big cats and the wolves
to act as natural predators, then if not humans have to do that job.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I took Zoology; I understand something about ecosystems. But
ecosystems *do* change, inevitably. The feral cats may simply be part
of a change of ecosystem, a part of evolution, and may yet have value
to that ecosystem of which we are not yet aware. Sometimes by trying
to solve a problem (particularly taking the easy way out), we humans
make more of a mess of things.
We cant afford to have a huge continent like Australia loosing its
topsoil, which it will do if its grazed to death by sheep, and its
marsupials are killed the animals and the land are one. They are part of
the whole ecosystem, introduce something outside of the system and like
Coypu in the Norfolk broads the whole ecology can start to collapse,
beyond saving. Its not just a few miles or a few animals, at risk, its
millions. Cats and other imported species, like dogs, fox's, sheep ect
must be controlled. Its that simple.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I don't want to see species decimated anywhere, whether it be in the
US or Australia. But I do think there *must* be a better solution to
this.
What solutions. If you can catch a feral cat, your doing better than
most of us, If you find volunteers to go out with very expensive stun
guns and injections to take out hundreds of thousands, even millions of
feral cats then your doing better than I expected...
the size of the problem is vast, its not just a few feral cats... who is
going to find the time or the money to catch them. And then the money to
have them neutered, and if they are released again they will carry on
killing an already hugely decimated local animal population..
What happens when they kill everything, they cats will die anyway,
because their will not be anything left to eat. Better a quick shot and
death than a slow death of starvation. And I would choose that for
myself as well as any animals I care about.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Here in the US, we have groups of caring people who do TNR
(trap, neuter and release), feed and manage feral colonies so they
have no need to feed on local wildlife. I understand, from what Yowie
told me, that this is difficult in Australia since most of the ferals
are in the Outback. It doesn't mean it is impossible.
Hmm Outback is a whole continent, I don't think you understand the scale
of the problem or of how big a continent Australia is, people on the
whole only live in a very small part of the continent mostly on the
coastlines... Its a hard country, it needed hard people to tame it, and
hard decisions made... a huge amount of Australia is semi arid, desert.
America by comparison was walk in the park...
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
If, instead of
saying "That's just the way it is; accept it" (an argument I always
find fault with, as if we all took that view, we would still be
lynching African-Americans in the American South and women would still
be unable to make decisions affecting their own bodies and lives),
people said "Let's fix this problem in a way that does no harm to the
animals", then we would be doing something positive, both about the
situation and for the ferals.
How about fixing the problem so that a whole ecology can be saved, their
is no way to hunt down and deal nicely with the amount of feral cats
that roam Australia, The land kills, their are miles upon miles of
nothing but sand and shrub, heat and sun, you need to be a tough animal
to survive out their, and cats are tough. Feral cats are not sweet
fluffy, little companions, they are spitting clawing, and dangerous
animals... obviously you never spent to much time on a farm with a good
few feral cats that haunted the barn and kept the mouse and rat
population in check. Go to stoke one of those and you would be lucky to
come out with your eyes, and your hand stripped of skin.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I will continue to pray to Bast for the protection of ferals
everywhere. They are, after all, Her children, too.
Cats of all animals are the ultimate survivors, more so than dogs, I
think Bast doesn't need to take a great deal of care of her children she
gave them every advantage in the killing and hunting department.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Ginger-lyn
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
ChrisB
2004-10-22 01:11:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Shez
I think most of us Ginger would prefer a better solution, but their
isn't one, Feral cats are a problem in many countries, In countries
where they should never have been introduced they have decimated the
local wildlife, affecting an ecological balance that has taken millions
of years to bring about... I don't want to shoot any animal, but if the
choice is between a whole ecology and feral cats then you have to be
sensible. You have to see the whole picture, not just the bits you want
to see, I suggest you do some web searches on feral cats in Australia
and the damage they are doing to the wild life, Don't forget Australia
has a very unique ecology Marsupials are nowhere else in the world in
such abundance... they can not be replaced from another gene pool, or
bred from captive animals from other countries, Once they are gone they
are gone.
I love cats, I have had cats for most of my life, But I can not and will
not put feral cats before the ecology of a whole country. Some things
are more important than our love for a particular type of animal.
I love dogs, I cant understand anyone hurting a dog or a cat for that
matter. But if dogs were running wild killing sheep for instance, as a
good Yorkshire lass I would take a rifle out myself and kill the dog...
I would be heartbroken having to do it, but if you had ever seen sheep
torn up by a dog, or lambs ripped to pieces you would feel differently I
assure you, It doesn't stop me loving dogs, or cats it simply is an
understanding that we all have our place on this earth, and once
something becomes out of place, like Feral cats in Australia, or dogs
killing sheep, you have to stop it happening.
Cats are born hunters, and they often play with their food, leaving it
half dead or maimed... some of the smaller marsupials, bush babies for
instance can be decimated by a cat... Would you feel sorry for the cat
if you came across a tiny bush baby torn to shreds and still alive...
You have to face mother nature eventually, and its tooth and claws as
well as beauty and spirituality.. Their is nothing in this world worse
than refusing to face facts... If as a human race we keep over
populating this planet then we like the dinosaur and like many other
species before us will condemn ourselves. We are part of nature to. And
we need to behave responsibly. Not foolishly.
--
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
After talking to Yowie on Monday, I have a better understanding of the
background of the problem. That being said, I still cannot agree.
Yes, we need to behave responsibly. It is humans behaving
irresponsibly who have created the problem, and it is up to humans to
fix the problem without making it worse. We have similar things here,
for instance, with deer populations getting out of control. I don't
appreciate setting loose hunters on deer just because we humans have
sprawled into *their* territory anymore than I appreciate shooting
cats. Punishing animals by taking away their lives because *we* have
made a mistake strikes me as terribly wrong.
I took Zoology; I understand something about ecosystems. But
ecosystems *do* change, inevitably. The feral cats may simply be part
of a change of ecosystem, a part of evolution, and may yet have value
to that ecosystem of which we are not yet aware. Sometimes by trying
to solve a problem (particularly taking the easy way out), we humans
make more of a mess of things.
I don't want to see species decimated anywhere, whether it be in the
US or Australia. But I do think there *must* be a better solution to
this. Here in the US, we have groups of caring people who do TNR
(trap, neuter and release), feed and manage feral colonies so they
have no need to feed on local wildlife. I understand, from what Yowie
told me, that this is difficult in Australia since most of the ferals
are in the Outback. It doesn't mean it is impossible. If, instead of
saying "That's just the way it is; accept it" (an argument I always
find fault with, as if we all took that view, we would still be
lynching African-Americans in the American South and women would still
be unable to make decisions affecting their own bodies and lives),
people said "Let's fix this problem in a way that does no harm to the
animals", then we would be doing something positive, both about the
situation and for the ferals.
I will continue to pray to Bast for the protection of ferals
everywhere. They are, after all, Her children, too.
Ginger-lyn
I don't think hunting is a punishment for the deer. Humans kill off all
the preditors. There is nothing to check the number of deer.

At this point the choice is for humans to hunt deer, to reintroduce the
preditors or to let the deer go though starvation cycles. Reintroducing
preditors has it's own complications... parvo decimated the pups when
people tried to reintroduce wolves into the Smokey Mountain National
Park. The last scenario was actually done in the Kaibab National Park
just outside the Grand Canyon. Because people wanted to see deer, the
rangers let the population grow beyond what the area could support.
Without wolves, coyotes (are they large enough or cooperative enough to
hunt deer?) or large cats they population was able to explode. Soon
there were too many deer and not enough trees, population crashed. When
it stabilized, the deer population started to explode again, but the
land could not support as many deer. Cycle repeated until rangers
started allowing hunters to check the deer population.

I dislike sport hunters. I would much rather the deer were honored by
the hunter taking the kill home, eating the venison and tanning the
hide, but a hopefully quick bullit is prefereable to slow starvation.
Even if the carcass is left for the scavengers and detritivores to consume.

When humans go into an ecosystem and change it, we have a responsibility
to fix any damage we cause or to heal it if possible. Going back to
feral felines in Australia, this may not be possible. That does not
mean that people should not try to stop the damage these wild cats are
causing.
Brock Ulfsen
2004-10-22 13:25:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I don't want to see species decimated anywhere, whether it be in the
US or Australia. But I do think there *must* be a better solution to
this. Here in the US, we have groups of caring people who do TNR
(trap, neuter and release), feed and manage feral colonies so they
have no need to feed on local wildlife. I understand, from what Yowie
told me, that this is difficult in Australia since most of the ferals
are in the Outback. It doesn't mean it is impossible.
Australia has 20,000,000 people. There are estimates as high as
40,000,000 cats, most more that 100 miles from the nearest urban centre.
Even well fed cats hunt, they cannot help it, it is their nature. if
they are not hungry they may merely maim their prey.

Oz Wildlife in the 100g to 2kg range is almost all completely incapable
of dealing with cats. Cats don't change ecosystems in Australia, they
wipe them out. Setrilise them of all mamamlian reptilian and avian life
in that weight range...

Another problem is that cats carry a variety of paracites that are
causing damage to wildlife that is ill adapted to these threats.

If we devoted the entire US national budget to the Australian cat
problem, we *may* be able to house the existing popukation until the end
of their lives, but doing so would be a monumental task.

Australia cannot afford even to shoot the current cat population, let
alone desex feed and house them. And the must be housed, Oz wildlife is
slaughtered by cats for fun even if they are well fed, because they
cannot escape a pouncing cat.

...Brock.
ChrisB
2004-10-22 17:54:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I don't want to see species decimated anywhere, whether it be in the
US or Australia. But I do think there *must* be a better solution to
this. Here in the US, we have groups of caring people who do TNR
(trap, neuter and release), feed and manage feral colonies so they
have no need to feed on local wildlife. I understand, from what Yowie
told me, that this is difficult in Australia since most of the ferals
are in the Outback. It doesn't mean it is impossible.
Australia has 20,000,000 people. There are estimates as high as
40,000,000 cats, most more that 100 miles from the nearest urban centre.
Even well fed cats hunt, they cannot help it, it is their nature. if
they are not hungry they may merely maim their prey.
Oz Wildlife in the 100g to 2kg range is almost all completely incapable
of dealing with cats. Cats don't change ecosystems in Australia, they
wipe them out. Setrilise them of all mamamlian reptilian and avian life
in that weight range...
Another problem is that cats carry a variety of paracites that are
causing damage to wildlife that is ill adapted to these threats.
If we devoted the entire US national budget to the Australian cat
problem, we *may* be able to house the existing popukation until the end
of their lives, but doing so would be a monumental task.
Australia cannot afford even to shoot the current cat population, let
alone desex feed and house them. And the must be housed, Oz wildlife is
slaughtered by cats for fun even if they are well fed, because they
cannot escape a pouncing cat.
...Brock.
Actually a well fed cat is a more effective hunter. One solution in the
states (US) is to neuter/spay and release or to give oral contraceptives
at feeding stations for stray populations. Neither of these solutions
would be appropriate in Australia as the cats would still be hunting
wildlife.

I don't agree with killing pets unless there is a valid need. But these
feral cats are not pets, and as with the rabbits mentioned earlier in
this thread, systematic hunting may be the only solution. Not one I
would be happy with but one I understand.
Yowie
2004-10-17 00:10:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Brock Ulfsen
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
Harm None doesn't mean Jainist sweeping of each footprint to remove
insects it means minimising harm and accepting consequences of ones actions.
...Brock.
I have to say that I am more than a bit surprised and horrified to see
such opinions expressed here. Many Wiccans are cat lovers, and some
(like myself) worship Bast. This, and some of the other comments
here, are very offensive to me, and to my Deity, and I am surprised to
see such lack of regard for life expressed in what has always been a
very intelligent group. It's particularly upsetting to me to see
comments about shooting feral cats proferred by posters whom I greatly
respect and even love, and I am so depressed by these comments, I woke
up today in tears and unable to get back to sleep.
I tried to ignore this thread, but obviously, I couldn't. I have
eight beloved cats, one of whom is a former feral. When I look into
his beautiful eyes, and then read some of the comments on this thread,
I am heartbroken. I know little about Australian ferals, but I can
tell you that there are many in the US who have the same attitude
about ferals here, and who actively shoot/poison/run over/whatever
feral cats. It breaks my heart.
Ginger-Lyn,

I'd like to explain why I (and a number of other Australians and New
Zealanders) have the opinion we have, but this is not the place to do it.
However, my intent is not to upset you either, so if you want to talk about
it, either by e-mail or by phone (I'd be happy to pay the charges), let me
know.

Yowie


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 9/10/04
Tiliqua
2004-10-19 05:15:07 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Ginger-lyn Summer's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Brock Ulfsen
You'll find all sorts of opinions held on arwm. Personally I'm firmly in
the camp that stray cats should be shot on sight. (The fur is lovely,
makes nice hats.)
Harm None doesn't mean Jainist sweeping of each footprint to remove
insects it means minimising harm and accepting consequences of ones actions.
...Brock.
I have to say that I am more than a bit surprised and horrified to see
such opinions expressed here. Many Wiccans are cat lovers, and some
(like myself) worship Bast. This, and some of the other comments
here, are very offensive to me, and to my Deity,
Interpolation:
You have quoted Brock's comment about stray cats, but which "other
comments" did you find offensive, Ginger-Lynn?
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
and I am surprised to
see such lack of regard for life expressed in what has always been a
very intelligent group.
All life ends.

Some creatures are in places they should NOT be.

The group in question, (feral cats in Australia), are causing MAJOR
damage to the whole unique small-animal ecology in this country
because placental mammals out-compete marsupials. They are more
efficient breeders and the cats are certainly the most efficient
killers.

If you and Bast can persuade them to surrender themselves to gathering
points from whence they can be shipped to mainland America, or Europe
or Asia, then I'm certainly willing to contribute towards their
shipping costs.

Until then, or until some other life-preserving method of removing
them from the Australian ecology can be implemented, then shooting is
the most humane path to that goal.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
It's particularly upsetting to me to see
comments about shooting feral cats proferred by posters whom I greatly
respect and even love, and I am so depressed by these comments, I woke
up today in tears and unable to get back to sleep.
You have my sympathy as a long-term fellow-depressee but the whole
point is that the numbers of feral cats in Australia MUST be reduced
to preserve (and in places restore) the very special balance of the
small-animal life-web here.

Offer a better way which achieves this goal and we'll be right with
you.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I tried to ignore this thread, but obviously, I couldn't. I have
eight beloved cats, one of whom is a former feral. When I look into
his beautiful eyes, and then read some of the comments on this thread,
I am heartbroken. I know little about Australian ferals, but I can
tell you that there are many in the US who have the same attitude
about ferals here, and who actively shoot/poison/run over/whatever
feral cats. It breaks my heart.
I have had the privilege of many DOMESTIC feline companions over the
past fifty-(cough) years, but usually only one or two at a time. Most
of them were urban cats, Oscar (the Glossiest Cat in the Galaxy) is a
suburban cat.

You may not be aware of the restrictions under the law we have here
under various state Companian Animal Acts. All cats sold must (as I
stated in another post) be vaccinated, chipped and desexed and you
must keep a set of papers for each of them, including veterinary
history

Your total of eight would not be permitted in most places.

General Brief Overview of Australian Ecological Concerns:-
We are faced with the consequences of errors made in the early days of
the European colonisation of the country. Some of those errors are
continuing today. For example, the hard-hoofed meat animals, sheep,
cattle and goats which are STILL being encouraged are destroying the
plant ecology and the soil structure.

This latter is more important here than on other continents, because
the tectonic plate has been so stable for hundreds of millions of
years, unlike the majority of others which have active volcanic and
plate subduction areas whereby the soil is continuously regenerated.
Ours isn't and because it's been used for so long, it's deficient so
we not only have to hang on to every particle, we have to add to it..

We need to preserve our soil, but the introduced animals are tearing
out the roots of the plants which hold the earth together. You'd be
aware of the term "dustbowl" and when the slightest breeze turns the
dusk sky purple with stolen soil, strong farmers cry!

The local grazing animal, the kangaroo, cuts off the leaves ABOVE the
root crown, leaving the crown to regenerate AND the roots still in
place continue to hold the soil together.

Frankly, I look forward to the day when we start to harvest roos
instead of beef and sheep and the last of the cattle can be declared
feral too.

Back in the mid-19th century the deliberate release of rabbits and
foxes for the jaded self-appointed "squattocracy" to hunt has also had
devastating effects. Look for news vision of the 1948 rabbit plague
for examples of ecology-destroying errors and for the horrible actions
which must be taken to mitigate the effects.

We have fluffy bunny-rabbits in Oz, but we are using poison to kill or
destroy their reproduction, we have bacterial and viral agents to kill
or weaken them, we rip out their warrens with bulldozers and shoot
those who try to escape. The inhumane methods, (like traps) are now
banned, but they weren't efficient enough, either. We need better
methods of mass slaughter.

If it were people, we would embrace the action of genocide because we
are fighting to preserve and replenish this country which has its own
gods and spirits and its own animals in their proper places. Their
proper places have been worked out over 500 million years that the
continent has been isolated from the rest of the world.

The invaders must be wiped out and that includes the wild horses of
the Snowy, the water buffalo which destroy the Northern billabongs,
the cane-toad (bufo marinus) which is so poisonous it's even killing
off goannas, and which has now penetrated Kakadu National Park AND the
cats.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Ginger-lyn
deeply saddened
And when the last quoll, or numbat or sugar glider or koala or
antechinus or bandicoot also dies because its land and food have been
destroyed by ferals or because it's been pounced on and killed by fox
or cat, or the last Johnson's (fish-eating) crocodile can't find food
because the water-buffalo have turned its billabong into a wallow or
the wild pigs have eaten the last python, then I'm sure you will be
just as sad.

We're trying to fix this so it doesn't happen and if that means that
we need to kill some cats, then we shall do this in the greater cause.
I would proudly wear cat-skin gloves or a cat-fur hat or waistcoat if
the climate weren't so bloody hot. Re-use, replace, recycle and
reproduce responsibly.
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Ginger-lyn Summer
2004-10-21 18:20:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
You have quoted Brock's comment about stray cats, but which "other
comments" did you find offensive, Ginger-Lynn?
Sorry I wasn't clear. Sometimes I worry too much about saving
bandwidth. Obviously, the feral cat debate is the other part of it.

<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
If you and Bast can persuade them to surrender themselves to gathering
points from whence they can be shipped to mainland America, or Europe
or Asia, then I'm certainly willing to contribute towards their
shipping costs.
I'll do my best ;-)
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
You have my sympathy as a long-term fellow-depressee but the whole
point is that the numbers of feral cats in Australia MUST be reduced
to preserve (and in places restore) the very special balance of the
small-animal life-web here.
Offer a better way which achieves this goal and we'll be right with
you.
I would love to do that. However, I think it is going to have to be
the Australians who love cats and disagree with this method who will
have to actually come up with and implement ideas. There is little I
can do from here in the US.
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
I have had the privilege of many DOMESTIC feline companions over the
past fifty-(cough) years, but usually only one or two at a time. Most
of them were urban cats, Oscar (the Glossiest Cat in the Galaxy) is a
suburban cat.
You may not be aware of the restrictions under the law we have here
under various state Companian Animal Acts. All cats sold must (as I
stated in another post) be vaccinated, chipped and desexed and you
must keep a set of papers for each of them, including veterinary
history
Your total of eight would not be permitted in most places.
I would find that very sad, although in some suburbs in my area there
are limits as well. As long as all are well-cared-for, I see no need
for arbitrary limits. Mine are all vaccinated and desexed (except
Arthur, my newest, who is six months old and will be getting neutered
soon), and I have folders for each of their veterinary history. Not
required here; I just do it. Haven't done microchipping yet, as it is
very expensive, but all mine are indoor-only cats anyway. So the only
wildlife around here who are in danger are the few stray bugs and mice
who find their way inside.
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
And when the last quoll, or numbat or sugar glider or koala or
antechinus or bandicoot also dies because its land and food have been
destroyed by ferals or because it's been pounced on and killed by fox
or cat, or the last Johnson's (fish-eating) crocodile can't find food
because the water-buffalo have turned its billabong into a wallow or
the wild pigs have eaten the last python, then I'm sure you will be
just as sad.
Yes, that would be sad as well. But not as sad as the mass slaughter
of beautiful creatures whose only crime is to have been transported to
the wrong place.
<snip paragraph I found highly offensive>

I'm not going to say there is an easy situation or answer. But I
would suggest that if you can shoot a feral cat, you can also shoot a
feral cat with a tranquilizer, and then neuter/spay him/her, and begin
to cut down on the population humanely. At least it would be a start.

Ginger-lyn
Wood Avens
2004-10-21 19:01:10 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:20:50 CST, ***@neptunelink.com (Ginger-lyn
Summer) wrote:

[lots snipped]
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
all mine are indoor-only cats anyway.
It seems to me there are enormous cultural differences here. From a
personal and UK perspective, I find the idea of restricting cats to
indoors quite alien, for the same reason that I'm uncomfortable with
many animals being kept in zoos or circuses. Yet I know that
indoors-only cats are very common and quite acceptable in the USA, and
I've come to the conclusion that it's sensible for me to recognise
that this may be appropriate, due to conditions I really don't know
enough about, and that it would be futile for me to campaign against
it even though to me it looks like cruelty. Very much the same sort
of considerations surely apply in the case of Australia's feral cats:
a measure that looks bad from one perspective may in fact be the least
worst way of dealing with a specific situation.
--
Wood Avens

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
Baird Stafford
2004-10-21 23:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Wood Avens <***@askjennison.com> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Wood Avens
It seems to me there are enormous cultural differences here. From a
personal and UK perspective, I find the idea of restricting cats to
indoors quite alien, for the same reason that I'm uncomfortable with
many animals being kept in zoos or circuses. Yet I know that
indoors-only cats are very common and quite acceptable in the USA, and
I've come to the conclusion that it's sensible for me to recognise
that this may be appropriate, due to conditions I really don't know
enough about, and that it would be futile for me to campaign against
it even though to me it looks like cruelty.
Where I live also live raptors quite large enough to find even a big
_Felis_domesticus_ a lovely canape, and vipers that can easily swallow
one whole (although the serpents, of course, would then retire for a nap
where the birds wouldn't, necessarily). Fleas are endemic, outdoors,
but can be controlled if not eliminated indoors. Rabies is a problem -
especially since the vaccine can apparently cause cancerous growths on
older cats - and feline distemper has been known to sweep whole
neighborhoods. Not only that, but the weather does have occasional fits
of distemper strong enough to carry names.

Given all that, I can also see the opposite point of view - that putting
one's beloved pet outdoors looks like cruelty....

<snip>

Blessed be,
Baird
noting that Leila stays indoors because her first owner had her
"declawed..." - not a cruelty he, personally would inflict on a cat, but
something for which he doesn't blame the cat herself.
Tiliqua
2004-10-22 07:28:35 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Ginger-lyn Summer's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Post by Tiliqua
Under close feline supervision,
in which it was mentioned that
You have quoted Brock's comment about stray cats, but which "other
comments" did you find offensive, Ginger-Lynn?
Sorry I wasn't clear. Sometimes I worry too much about saving
bandwidth. Obviously, the feral cat debate is the other part of it.
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
If you and Bast can persuade them to surrender themselves to gathering
points from whence they can be shipped to mainland America, or Europe
or Asia, then I'm certainly willing to contribute towards their
shipping costs.
I'll do my best ;-)
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
You have my sympathy as a long-term fellow-depressee but the whole
point is that the numbers of feral cats in Australia MUST be reduced
to preserve (and in places restore) the very special balance of the
small-animal life-web here.
Offer a better way which achieves this goal and we'll be right with
you.
I would love to do that. However, I think it is going to have to be
the Australians who love cats and disagree with this method who will
have to actually come up with and implement ideas. There is little I
can do from here in the US.
Well, there are only three regular Australian contributors here
(AFAICT) and all three of us have supported the existing plan.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
I have had the privilege of many DOMESTIC feline companions over the
past fifty-(cough) years, but usually only one or two at a time. Most
of them were urban cats, Oscar (the Glossiest Cat in the Galaxy) is a
suburban cat.
You may not be aware of the restrictions under the law we have here
under various state Companian Animal Acts. All cats sold must (as I
stated in another post) be vaccinated, chipped and desexed and you
must keep a set of papers for each of them, including veterinary
history
Your total of eight would not be permitted in most places.
I would find that very sad, although in some suburbs in my area there
are limits as well. As long as all are well-cared-for, I see no need
for arbitrary limits.
Why do you categorise the limit as "arbitrary"? It's been carefully
worked out and democratically supported and agreed through the
democratic political processes.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Mine are all vaccinated and desexed (except
Arthur, my newest, who is six months old and will be getting neutered
soon), and I have folders for each of their veterinary history. Not
required here; I just do it. Haven't done microchipping yet, as it is
very expensive, but all mine are indoor-only cats anyway. So the only
wildlife around here who are in danger are the few stray bugs and mice
who find their way inside.
<snip>
Post by Tiliqua
And when the last quoll, or numbat or sugar glider or koala or
antechinus or bandicoot also dies because its land and food have been
destroyed by ferals or because it's been pounced on and killed by fox
or cat, or the last Johnson's (fish-eating) crocodile can't find food
because the water-buffalo have turned its billabong into a wallow or
the wild pigs have eaten the last python, then I'm sure you will be
just as sad.
Yes, that would be sad as well. But not as sad as the mass slaughter
of beautiful creatures whose only crime is to have been transported to
the wrong place.
"Mass slaughter"? Frankly, any hunter who can stalk and shoot a feral
cat is highly skilled. None of them can rack up a total that could in
any way be called "mass". Fifty to seventy per year is about the best
that a good hunter could manage.

I'm starting to get the impression that you're addicted to cliches. Is
all slaughter "mass"? Are all limits "arbitrary"? Are all creatures
"beautiful"? Certainly nobody has accused the feral cats of any crime.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
<snip paragraph I found highly offensive>
Tough. Did you find any footage of the solution to the 1948 rabbit
plague?
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I'm not going to say there is an easy situation or answer. But I
would suggest that if you can shoot a feral cat, you can also shoot a
feral cat with a tranquilizer, and then neuter/spay him/her, and begin
to cut down on the population humanely. At least it would be a start.
The difficulty is in the relative ranges of the rifle as opposed to
the range of the dart projector. You couldn't get close enough to dart
a feral cat.
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
Ginger-lyn
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Brock Ulfsen
2004-10-22 13:35:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I'm not going to say there is an easy situation or answer. But I
would suggest that if you can shoot a feral cat, you can also shoot a
feral cat with a tranquilizer, and then neuter/spay him/her, and begin
to cut down on the population humanely. At least it would be a start.
We don't have time. Many of our native animals have less than the
lifespan of a cat between seriously endangered and extinct.

...Brock.
Brock Ulfsen
2004-10-19 10:25:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ginger-lyn Summer
I tried to ignore this thread, but obviously, I couldn't. I have
eight beloved cats, one of whom is a former feral. When I look into
his beautiful eyes, and then read some of the comments on this thread,
I am heartbroken. I know little about Australian ferals, but I can
tell you that there are many in the US who have the same attitude
about ferals here, and who actively shoot/poison/run over/whatever
feral cats. It breaks my heart.
Feral cats are amongst the biggest destroyers of Australian native
wildlife. Rats, Foxes, Cane Toads Indian Mynars and Rabbits have all had
an impact, but Cats are utterly lethal.

Ultimately I would like to see all cats indoors and/or in outdoor cat
runs. You only have to look at the intestinal contents of ferals shot
encroaching on the tiny islands of fenced off bushland where remnant
populations of Australia's small mammals are being guarded to realise
just how dangerous these creatures are.

Would you support letting large numbers of Tigers loose in suburban
America? Cats are comparatively more devastating to the Australian
landscape. (The US already having some large Feline predators.) There
are a variety of Feline, Mustelid, Canid and other predators and meat
eating omnivores in North America, Oz has nothing in the same size class
as a housecat or large feral cat (except Goanas, and lizards are very
different oredators to mammals).

Australia had no predators as large and fast as a housecat for most of
the last 25,000 years, with feral cats often weighing in at 5 or 10
times the size of "Tiddles", they can eat almost anything that moves.

Cats are tough. Poisons (such as 1080) are used in some areas but are
very cruel. There are no non-lethal control options. Trapping cats is
hard, and then you have to dispose of them, humanely and cheaply.
Shooting them is somewhat cost effective, and more humane than a slow
death from poison.

Cats are completely out of place in the Australian Ecosystem. Think of
them as the predator equivalent of Kudzu.

I have shot cats, foxes, hares and rabbits in the past, as an active
enviromentalist. If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or
Lantana) from your forests, then in Australia you would more than likely
be in favour of culling feral cats.

...Brock.
(Who has a small very indoor cat of his own.)
Baird Stafford
2004-10-19 18:48:15 UTC
Permalink
Brock Ulfsen <***@tpg.com.au> wrote:

<snip>
If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or Lantana) from your
forests, then in Australia you would more than likely be in favour of
culling feral cats.
Kudzu, yes: it's yet another Japanese import. Lantana, however, is
native here and has Things to eat it....

Blessed be,
Baird
Gale
2004-10-19 19:18:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baird Stafford
<snip>
If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or Lantana) from your
forests, then in Australia you would more than likely be in favour of
culling feral cats.
Kudzu, yes: it's yet another Japanese import. Lantana, however, is
native here and has Things to eat it....
Are you suggesting there is something in Japan that actually eats kudzu?
--
Blessed Be,
Gale
(kudzu --> the vegetable that eats trees, houses, and long-parked cars)

poetry, fiction, reviews at my
Alchemist's Cauldron http://www.capjewels.com/gale/gale.html
modstaff alt.religion.wicca.moderated http:arwm.net

"Come, let us go, while we are in our prime,
And take the harmless folly of the time."
--- Robert Herrick, "Corrina's Going A-Maying"
phorbin
2004-10-20 00:23:41 UTC
Permalink
In article <LRcdd.85118$***@bignews1.bellsouth.net>, ***@bellsouth.net
says...
Post by Gale
Post by Baird Stafford
<snip>
If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or Lantana) from your
forests, then in Australia you would more than likely be in favour of
culling feral cats.
Kudzu, yes: it's yet another Japanese import. Lantana, however, is
native here and has Things to eat it....
Are you suggesting there is something in Japan that actually eats kudzu?
People?
ChrisB
2004-10-20 05:02:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gale
Post by Baird Stafford
<snip>
If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or Lantana) from your
forests, then in Australia you would more than likely be in favour of
culling feral cats.
Kudzu, yes: it's yet another Japanese import. Lantana, however, is
native here and has Things to eat it....
Are you suggesting there is something in Japan that actually eats kudzu?
Yep, not sure what insect, thinking either beetle or catepiller but
there is a bug in Japan that eats kudzu.
Baird Stafford
2004-10-20 09:08:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gale
Post by Baird Stafford
<snip>
If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or Lantana) from your
forests, then in Australia you would more than likely be in favour of
culling feral cats.
Kudzu, yes: it's yet another Japanese import. Lantana, however, is
native here and has Things to eat it....
Are you suggesting there is something in Japan that actually eats kudzu?
Of course there is. Were there not, Japan would long ago have sunk back
into the sea (except for perhaps the top of Mt. Fuji) from the weight of
the stuff. Witness Georgia.

Blessed be,
Baird
Tiliqua
2004-10-20 06:31:16 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Baird Stafford's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Baird Stafford
<snip>
If you would cut an invasive weed like Kudzu (or Lantana) from your
forests, then in Australia you would more than likely be in favour of
culling feral cats.
Kudzu, yes: it's yet another Japanese import. Lantana, however, is
native here and has Things to eat it....
Blessed be,
Baird
There are some bio-control experiments (now just started field trials)
with one or more lantana bugs (they're genuine sap-suckers) but they
seem to be climatically restricted to above a line near the
NSW-Queensland border, so it's still a genuine cut and poison and
shred and bag and stew in the hot sun task for us who are South of
that line and still have lantana invasion to deal with.
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Jackdaw
2004-10-19 18:40:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brock Ulfsen
Ultimately I would like to see all cats indoors and/or in outdoor cat
runs. You only have to look at the intestinal contents of ferals shot
encroaching on the tiny islands of fenced off bushland where remnant
populations of Australia's small mammals are being guarded to realise
just how dangerous these creatures are.
Would you support letting large numbers of Tigers loose in suburban
America?
Saved up and looked forwards to and bought the DVD "The Day After Tomorrow"

After watching the DVD today YES!
And Wolves and Leopards and.. and ....
Oh yeh, big spiders and killer bunnies!
Couldn't be worse than that ***** Film!
--
Jackdaw, collector of facts, trivia and bright twinkly things.
Folio--- http://www.jackdaw-crafts.co.uk
Rowan
2004-10-15 03:44:04 UTC
Permalink
I kicked my cat when she bit me maliciously. As opposed to play. She hasn't
tried it again...

And I caught a stray tom that attacked my cat when she was a kitten and had
it put down.

you think people who just get pissed off with their cats are harsh,
heaven knows what you think of me!!

BB
Rowan
Post by Lady Nina
Post by Baird Stafford
Post by Vaney
Post by Lady Nina
<probably taking bait from a troll but what the hell>
No, I'm not a troll, just a longtime lurker and sometime poster who thought to
ask cat-people a question.
I should like to point out that alt.religion.wicca.moderated is called
"moderated" for a reason - and that we of the Modstaff do take seriously
the effort to keep trolls on the other side of the fence.
Acknowledged. I was here when the last spat from the poster who likes
to stir happened. All the modstaff gave it serious thought and made a
well reasoned decision.
Post by Baird Stafford
When an
article like Vaney's makes it to the newsgroup, it is because one or
another of us has decided that the poster is *not* a troll
And clearly isn't from the follow up. However this
" I'm getting to the point where I'm beginning to value the mean
barfing cat a bit less than my nice new rug (and new down comforter,
could you imagine????)"
on a group such as arwm, where respect for living beings rather than
objects ime is a feature of the thinking of posters here, set alarm
bells ringing.
Post by Baird Stafford
- and, were I
the kind to take umbrage at every possible slight
No slight intended to the mod staff and apologies for any
inadvertently given - I hadn't even thought about the fact it would
have had to come through moderation - you all do your jobs so well I
sometimes forget you are there. <g>
Post by Baird Stafford
posted on usenet
against me or my associates, I would at this point be in a high dudgeon.
That I'd like to see, only not aimed in my general direction <g>
Post by Baird Stafford
In point of fact, I, personally, get just the tiniest little bit tired
of the automatic, *posted* assumption
I tend to say it if I think it.
Post by Baird Stafford
that anyone unfamiliar
True, the unfamiliarity (I've only been in these parts a few months)
coupled with the specific sentiment, as above, seemed odd for an arwm
post.
Post by Baird Stafford
who posts
an article that is even the slightest bit off the beaten path (or "out
of the usual rut," which is the way I first phrased it in my own mind)
I found (and still find) the sentiment expressed above abhorrent to
me.
Post by Baird Stafford
must, automatically and by definition, be a troll.
Hence my 'probably' not definitely. Further information has shown that
the OP is not a troll, just IMO, has expressed skewed priorities which
I was surprised to see in arwm.
--
Lady Nina
Michael
2004-11-02 22:09:16 UTC
Permalink
"Vaney" <***@aol.complicated> wrote in message news:***@mb-m13.aol.com...


<snipped details of throwing up cats> :)


Here's a question. What are you feeding them (canned vs. dry, and what
brands).

We have a 12 year old male (neutered) who has a history of what we would
call bulemia. He would pig out on certain kinds of food, usually the dry
food, then throw it back up, only to eat more.
We found that by changing the dry food we used to the Authority brand indoor
cat-food, or IAMS adult formula, it reduced his tendancy to over-eat.

I understand the feeling of "oh, no, not again!!!" when you've had to clean
up the same rug for the third time that day. We rant and roar, even though
deep down we KNOW we would never hurt our friends.

Check into what your cats are eating and ask your vet if there are some
ingredients the cat should avoid.


And as always, hope this helps.


Michael
Jackdaw
2004-11-03 06:44:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael
<snipped details of throwing up cats> :)
Here's a question. What are you feeding them (canned vs. dry, and what
brands).
We have a 12 year old male (neutered) who has a history of what we would
call bulemia. He would pig out on certain kinds of food, usually the dry
food, then throw it back up, only to eat more.
We found that by changing the dry food we used to the Authority brand indoor
cat-food, or IAMS adult formula, it reduced his tendancy to over-eat.
I understand the feeling of "oh, no, not again!!!" when you've had to clean
up the same rug for the third time that day. We rant and roar, even though
deep down we KNOW we would never hurt our friends.
Check into what your cats are eating and ask your vet if there are some
ingredients the cat should avoid.
And as always, hope this helps.
Someone here ( I think ) suggested putting clean biggish pebbles into the
feeding bowl with the cat food, so's they have to eat around it, thus
stopping them bolting their food. Seems a cheap easy solution.
--
Jackdaw, collector of facts, trivia and bright twinkly things.
Folio--- http://www.jackdaw-crafts.co.uk
Michael
2004-11-03 18:15:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jackdaw
Someone here ( I think ) suggested putting clean biggish pebbles into the
feeding bowl with the cat food, so's they have to eat around it, thus
stopping them bolting their food. Seems a cheap easy solution.
I would be too concerned that the cat would eat the pebbles as well (unless
we're talking LARGE pebbles). My cats will eat just about anything that
smells like food. :)

Michael
Jackdaw
2004-11-03 18:45:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael
Post by Jackdaw
Someone here ( I think ) suggested putting clean biggish pebbles into the
feeding bowl with the cat food, so's they have to eat around it, thus
stopping them bolting their food. Seems a cheap easy solution.
I would be too concerned that the cat would eat the pebbles as well (unless
we're talking LARGE pebbles). My cats will eat just about anything that
smells like food. :)
That's what I meant by "biggish".
I mean larger than a cat's mouth smooth easy to clean stream washed
pebbles.
--
Jackdaw, collector of facts, trivia and bright twinkly things.
Folio--- http://www.jackdaw-crafts.co.uk
Yowie
2004-11-03 22:18:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael
Post by Michael
Post by Jackdaw
Someone here ( I think ) suggested putting clean biggish pebbles into
the
Post by Michael
Post by Jackdaw
feeding bowl with the cat food, so's they have to eat around it, thus
stopping them bolting their food. Seems a cheap easy solution.
I would be too concerned that the cat would eat the pebbles as well
(unless
Post by Michael
we're talking LARGE pebbles). My cats will eat just about anything that
smells like food. :)
That's what I meant by "biggish".
I mean larger than a cat's mouth smooth easy to clean stream washed
pebbles.
Marbles also work pretty well.

Yowie

Shez
2004-10-04 23:06:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
Why not try changing the diet, try something completely new, and give
lots of very small portions for a week or two, something like four or
five times a day, that way even if your greedy cat gobbles to fast,
their will not be enough in his stomach to cause a problem. If he is
eating that desperatly have you considered worming him,
Can your cat get to fresh grass they normally eat grass for stomach and
bowel problems, if he cant then grow some grass in a pot for him... it
will make a huge difference to his health and well being, in the
meantime go out with a fork and dig some grass up and put it in a pot.
I used to feed my old cat Mindy on raw egg and milk mixed together when
she had a tummy problem, it fixed it nicely, also added a yeast tablet
to her food a couple of times a week. Mindy lived until she was 31 so I
guess the diet suited her,
Could be the cat has an irritable stomach or bowel, and the food your
giving him is irritating it further. If the worm tablets and grass don't
help switch to a chicken a rice diet for a little while and see if that
douse the trick.
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Tiliqua
2004-10-05 00:28:36 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Vaney's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
Thanks in advance,
Corri
to email, simplify...
"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Halve the food intake for at least a month.
Mix cooked vegetables into the meat ration too, a little potato or
rice, a teaspoon of carrot.

Only put down kibble at mealtimes (morning or evening) and the other
food at the other time. Yes, it will get worse before it gets better.
Supervise mealtimes so that the big one doesn't steal from the timid
one.

Put expendable covers over the non-expendable furniture (Furniture?
with CATS???)

Are they outside cats? Do they get the chance to hunt? A hunting cat
seems to suffer fewer digestive problems, whether it's the extra
exercise or the fur on the prey.

Be assured, wherever there are people, there are rats and rats are
good prey - they just make the halitosis bad. (Oscar the Glossiest Cat
in the Galaxy is sometimes affectionately referred to as
"rat-breath"and thrown off the bed.)
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
don
2004-10-05 00:30:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
Thanks in advance,
Corri
to email, simplify...
"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Well, I have gone thru this with several older cats, and what has
worked for me (vets advice from the first one) is Iams for mature cats
(pink bags). Works wonders, and when you find it with hairball
control it is even better. What I have found is just that the older
cat's tummy is a bit like my own, senesitive and needing a bit of TLC

blessings
don
Don Hilliker
http://www.intricatearticles.com
Shez
2004-10-05 00:35:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by don
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
Thanks in advance,
Corri
to email, simplify...
"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Well, I have gone thru this with several older cats, and what has
worked for me (vets advice from the first one) is Iams for mature cats
(pink bags). Works wonders, and when you find it with hairball
control it is even better. What I have found is just that the older
cat's tummy is a bit like my own, senesitive and needing a bit of TLC
blessings
don
Don Hilliker
http://www.intricatearticles.com
Oh poor Don.... I know what you mean, irritable tummy or irritable bowel
is a pain in the ass literally... I used to have a cast iron stomach,
these days it seems to be made of glass.... :)
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Turtle
2004-10-06 03:23:28 UTC
Permalink
Sorry about not quoting, I'm very tired this evening!

I have had a lot of cats and some of them have thrown up a lot more than
others. The two we have right now hardly ever do unless they eat something
other than their regular kibble. I'm feeding both of them Hill's Science Diet
Hairball Control Light (the "light" because they are such fine *big* boys!)

I don't have experience with the specific problem of cats who eat too fast but
I believe there are some good possible solutions already given here.

And as already mentioned, vomiting can be a symptom of a lot of things going
wrong. It was kidney disease with one of my former cats. And there is always
the possiblity that the cat is allergic to something in the food. Right now we
have a little Chihuahua dog with that problem; she has to eat special food made
with only chicken and potatoes. She can't have any grains, eggs or fish, which
are found in most commercial foods. I have seen some websites that advocate
feeding your pets only natural foods you prepare yourself, but right now can't
lay my hands on one. A search should be easy to do.

I swear that some years I spend more on my animals' health care than I do on my
own!


Turtle

Still crazy after all these years...
Don
2004-10-07 00:50:25 UTC
Permalink
snip for brevity
Post by Shez
Oh poor Don.... I know what you mean, irritable tummy or irritable bowel
is a pain in the ass literally... I used to have a cast iron stomach,
these days it seems to be made of glass.... :)
was not that many years ago that I had that myself, but then the
diverticulitis cropped up. Lost my favorite snack foods, and have to
watch my diet closely, but at least I am not in such bad shape that I
am sick all of the time. I knew I was getting the over the hill range
when I had to start carrying meds with me for those bad moments, but
at least I live a normal life other than watching what I eat and
(trying) to minimize the stress in my life.


blessings to all

don
Don Hilliker
Intricate Articles
http://www.intricatearticles.com
Shez
2004-10-07 12:27:21 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@4ax.com>, Don <don@*nospa
m*intricatearticles.com> writes
Post by Don
snip for brevity
Post by Shez
Oh poor Don.... I know what you mean, irritable tummy or irritable bowel
is a pain in the ass literally... I used to have a cast iron stomach,
these days it seems to be made of glass.... :)
was not that many years ago that I had that myself, but then the
diverticulitis cropped up. Lost my favorite snack foods, and have to
watch my diet closely, but at least I am not in such bad shape that I
am sick all of the time. I knew I was getting the over the hill range
when I had to start carrying meds with me for those bad moments, but
at least I live a normal life other than watching what I eat and
(trying) to minimize the stress in my life.
blessings to all
don
Don Hilliker
Intricate Articles
http://www.intricatearticles.com
I carry indigestion tablets and have medications for ulcers, not that I
have ulcers, the medication I take for Fibro gives me such an acid
stomach and heartburn it makes life a misery.. So the medication keeps
it in check, unless of course I eat something that irritates my stomach,
like fresh bread (Sigh) and a few other things I love eating, but my
stomach objects to :)
Its good for my diet though, but I used to be as thin as a rake, and eat
like a horse... You don't appreciate cast iron stomachs when you have
them.
--
Shez ***@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
Pangur Ban
2004-10-05 01:07:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
Thanks in advance,
Corri
to email, simplify...
"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Sounds as though Jumbo is trying to make certain
Mumbo does not get any food. Do NOT keep kibble
out!!!! Two small feedings a day are enough. Put
down food for both - let both feed - then remove
the bowls. If Mumbo finishes first - remove the
bowl so Jumbo cannot access it. If Jumbo finishes
first and moves in on Mumbo - remove her to a
different room.

That was my solution to the same problem.

Pang
Yowie
2004-10-05 01:08:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
I can't see your post in RPCA, and my listings go back to early august
(assuming you posted under the same ID). I've taken the liberty to crosspost
this over to there again. Since I'm a 'known' RPCAer, you should get some
more responses.

Accept the cats, like children, occasionally barf, for no apparant (to us
dumb humans) reason. If you want pristine furniture, get a pet rock.

First, take your cat to the vet to rule out any medical problems. I won't
rant upon this, but I do wonder why you haven't done this already.
After the all-clear from your vet, and if s/he doesn't give you any other
advice (although I would wonder about a vet who doesn't give you advice when
you ask them about a barfing cat) there are several things you could try:

First we have to have a good look at the barf: What is the state of the food
in when its barfed back? How much does she barf? Is there hair in the barf?

Does she always barf, or just sometimes? Is she losing weight? How long has
it being going on? Did anything change at the time the barfing started?

Is she going to the toilet (both solids and liquid) OK? Could the kibble be
going off / getting contaminated during the day?

Jumbo may be feeling insecure about Bagheera and try to eat all her food
before Bagheera & Mumbo can get in and bully it away from her. The first
thing I'd try is feeding the cats seperately, and not leaving out the
kibble. Littermates don't always get along. They are neutered / desexed
aren't they?

Cats barf due to stress. Get some feliway to relieve the stress (its happy
hormones for cats). It should also tone down Bagheera's agression (which may
very well be causing the barfing inthe first place)

Make *sure* it isn't hairballs, just because there's no hair in it doesn't
mean its not *caused* by a hairball that she can't get up (hence, take a
good look at the barf).

Make sure it isn't an allergy or dislike of the food. If you do change the
food, though, do it slowly because just a sudden change in food can make
cats barf.

And also make sure that there's a fresh supply of cat grass somewhere
around, and that Jumbo isn't get into anything that would cause her to throw
up (like garbage, poisonous plants etc etc).

Eating-too-fast barf is generally undigested, almost fresh looking, and its
not a whole stomach full's worth of barf, just the 'excess' that, err,
'doesn't fit'. If its simply eating too fast, but some pebbles into the
bowl, so Jumbo has to eat around them, that will slow down the eating.

First and formost though, if it were my cat, I'd be going to see a vet
rather than asking a newsgroup. A vet visit would surely be cheaper than
getting the couch cleaned again.

Yowie
Teacher gal
2004-10-05 03:44:24 UTC
Permalink
: "Vaney" told us the following:
: >
: > I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
: > rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo,
: who is
: > small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as
: Bagheera
: > and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been
: barfing
: > quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...)

PLEASE take little Jumbo to the vets as soon as possible! We had the same
problem with our Setanta, and found out that, due to his size, he had feline
hepatic lipidosis, a usually fatal liver disease that they're unsure of the
cause of. Shay had always been a big kitty, but had just abruptly stopped
eating for awhile, and was throwing up all of the time. We thought nothing
of it, but it turned out that he was very ill. Had we taken him into the
vet earlier, he might not have had to endure three months of feeding tubes.
Broke my heart to have to put him down.

While I doubt this is what your kitty has, don't wait to get a vet to check
him out. Any time a kitty starts throwing up a lot, take him in. It's much
easier to justify the thirty bucks or so and find out he's fine than it is
trying to deal with the guilt when he's going through such pain later on.

Anastasia
Karen Chuplis
2004-10-05 03:44:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo,
who is
Post by Vaney
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as
Bagheera
Post by Vaney
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been
barfing
Post by Vaney
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy,
not a
Post by Vaney
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the
kibble out
Post by Vaney
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I
tried
Post by Vaney
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the
point
Post by Vaney
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice
new
Post by Vaney
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be
scared
Post by Vaney
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
I can't see your post in RPCA, and my listings go back to early august
(assuming you posted under the same ID). I've taken the liberty to crosspost
this over to there again. Since I'm a 'known' RPCAer, you should get some
more responses.
Accept the cats, like children, occasionally barf, for no apparant (to us
dumb humans) reason. If you want pristine furniture, get a pet rock.
First, take your cat to the vet to rule out any medical problems. I won't
rant upon this, but I do wonder why you haven't done this already.
After the all-clear from your vet, and if s/he doesn't give you any other
advice (although I would wonder about a vet who doesn't give you advice when
First we have to have a good look at the barf: What is the state of the food
in when its barfed back? How much does she barf? Is there hair in the barf?
Does she always barf, or just sometimes? Is she losing weight? How long has
it being going on? Did anything change at the time the barfing started?
Is she going to the toilet (both solids and liquid) OK? Could the kibble be
going off / getting contaminated during the day?
Jumbo may be feeling insecure about Bagheera and try to eat all her food
before Bagheera & Mumbo can get in and bully it away from her. The first
thing I'd try is feeding the cats seperately, and not leaving out the
kibble. Littermates don't always get along. They are neutered / desexed
aren't they?
Cats barf due to stress. Get some feliway to relieve the stress (its happy
hormones for cats). It should also tone down Bagheera's agression (which may
very well be causing the barfing inthe first place)
Make *sure* it isn't hairballs, just because there's no hair in it doesn't
mean its not *caused* by a hairball that she can't get up (hence, take a
good look at the barf).
Make sure it isn't an allergy or dislike of the food. If you do change the
food, though, do it slowly because just a sudden change in food can make
cats barf.
And also make sure that there's a fresh supply of cat grass somewhere
around, and that Jumbo isn't get into anything that would cause her to throw
up (like garbage, poisonous plants etc etc).
Eating-too-fast barf is generally undigested, almost fresh looking, and its
not a whole stomach full's worth of barf, just the 'excess' that, err,
'doesn't fit'. If its simply eating too fast, but some pebbles into the
bowl, so Jumbo has to eat around them, that will slow down the eating.
First and formost though, if it were my cat, I'd be going to see a vet
rather than asking a newsgroup. A vet visit would surely be cheaper than
getting the couch cleaned again.
Yowie
Yup. That pretty much covers it Yowie! I too, do not remember seeing a post
about this.
MaryL
2004-10-05 17:31:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vaney
Post by Vaney
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo,
who is
Post by Vaney
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as
Bagheera
Post by Vaney
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been
barfing
Post by Vaney
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy,
not a
Post by Vaney
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the
kibble out
Post by Vaney
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I
tried
Post by Vaney
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the
point
Post by Vaney
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my
nice
Post by Vaney
new
Post by Vaney
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be
scared
Post by Vaney
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
I can't see your post in RPCA, and my listings go back to early august
(assuming you posted under the same ID). I've taken the liberty to crosspost
this over to there again. Since I'm a 'known' RPCAer, you should get some
more responses.
Accept the cats, like children, occasionally barf, for no apparant (to us
dumb humans) reason. If you want pristine furniture, get a pet rock.
First, take your cat to the vet to rule out any medical problems. I won't
rant upon this, but I do wonder why you haven't done this already.
After the all-clear from your vet, and if s/he doesn't give you any other
advice (although I would wonder about a vet who doesn't give you advice when
First we have to have a good look at the barf: What is the state of the food
in when its barfed back? How much does she barf? Is there hair in the barf?
Does she always barf, or just sometimes? Is she losing weight? How long has
it being going on? Did anything change at the time the barfing started?
Is she going to the toilet (both solids and liquid) OK? Could the kibble be
going off / getting contaminated during the day?
Jumbo may be feeling insecure about Bagheera and try to eat all her food
before Bagheera & Mumbo can get in and bully it away from her. The first
thing I'd try is feeding the cats seperately, and not leaving out the
kibble. Littermates don't always get along. They are neutered / desexed
aren't they?
Cats barf due to stress. Get some feliway to relieve the stress (its happy
hormones for cats). It should also tone down Bagheera's agression (which may
very well be causing the barfing inthe first place)
Make *sure* it isn't hairballs, just because there's no hair in it doesn't
mean its not *caused* by a hairball that she can't get up (hence, take a
good look at the barf).
Make sure it isn't an allergy or dislike of the food. If you do change the
food, though, do it slowly because just a sudden change in food can make
cats barf.
And also make sure that there's a fresh supply of cat grass somewhere
around, and that Jumbo isn't get into anything that would cause her to throw
up (like garbage, poisonous plants etc etc).
Eating-too-fast barf is generally undigested, almost fresh looking, and its
not a whole stomach full's worth of barf, just the 'excess' that, err,
'doesn't fit'. If its simply eating too fast, but some pebbles into the
bowl, so Jumbo has to eat around them, that will slow down the eating.
First and formost though, if it were my cat, I'd be going to see a vet
rather than asking a newsgroup. A vet visit would surely be cheaper than
getting the couch cleaned again.
Yowie
In addition to the advice given by Yowie (excellent post!) and Anastasia, I
would like to add this: As Yowie said, it is important to examine the
contents. I found that Duffy was barfing something strange-looking shortly
after I adopted him. Closer examination showed that he had been chewing on
"something green." I looked around the house and discovered that he was
eating the edge of an artificial palm (I had already given up on "real"
indoor plants because Holly would eat them). I got rid of that plant, then
Duffy started to chew on another artificial plant. So, I got rid of any
artificial plants with a "grassy" look to them -- he is blind and cannot
actually see them, but the grassy texture seemed to attract him. I also
began to provide little pots of real grass for my twosome. On a similar
note, Holly had several episodes of throwing up several years ago that
really freaked me out -- the contents looked like she had swallowed lots of
long-legged spiders. I looked all around the house and couldn't find any.
The next time it happened, I looked more closely...and discovered that the
"spiders" were actually some Spanish moss from the base of a ficus tree.
Whew! What a relief! Out went the Spanish moss and in came some gravel to
cover the base. (For an exercise in hilarity, I wish all of you could see
Duffy with the ficus...he does not eat that one, but he climbs it!!)
Incidentally, pumpkin is an excellent additive if you learn that the problem
really is furballs.

Also note: It is very important to have your cats checked regularly by a
competent vet. This should be your first action (for all of your cats) if
you do not already have a program for regular veterinary care.

MaryL
(take out the litter to reply)

Photos of Duffy and Holly: >'o'<
http://tinyurl.com/8y54 (Introducing Duffy to Holly)
http://tinyurl.com/8y56 (Duffy and Holly "settle in")
Tiliqua
2004-10-07 01:55:00 UTC
Permalink
Under close feline supervision,
I reply to Yowie's thesis:
in which it was mentioned that
Post by Yowie
Eating-too-fast barf is generally undigested, almost fresh looking, and its
not a whole stomach full's worth of barf, just the 'excess' that, err,
'doesn't fit'. If its simply eating too fast, but some pebbles into the
bowl, so Jumbo has to eat around them, that will slow down the eating.
Now THAT'S good practical advice I hadn't heard before. I shall rush
down to the creek and get some for Oscar.

Thanks Yowie!
--

May the Lord and The Lady prosper your ventures
Dyannalyn
2004-10-05 01:16:05 UTC
Permalink
I have the same problem with my 14 year old calico, Pandora -- she is well
fed and healthy, but always eats like she'll never be fed again. Because
the other two, Asia and Pudge, eat slower, Pandora finishes her bowl way
ahead of them and tries to push them away from their respective bowls -- I
have to stand there until all are finished eating to make sure everyone gets
their share, or she will eat it all. Then because of overeating and too
fast, up it comes. Vet says she's fine (for a 14 year old). Although I
have recently switched to Purina One's Sensitive System (was mixing it half
and half with the Hairball formula, but now trying it alone), and she seems
to be upchucking a little less -- at least not EVERY day anymore -- maybe
just a few times a week. A male Bombay I had before her, Sgt. Pepper, was
the same way the last 5 or so years of his life (he lived 15 years). Is
your Jumbo an older kitty (10+)?

Blessings,
^..^< Dyannalyn >^..^<
~ ~

Take out the TRASH to email me
***@comcast.net

"Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good
with ketchup"
Greetings!
I have a question for you cat-people out there. (I already posted in
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes and didn't get much there). I have two, Mumbo, who is
small and primitive, and Jumbo, her littermate, who is about as big as Bagheera
and very smart (also mean to Mumbo). My problem is that Jumbo has been barfing
quite a lot (usually on the rug, or the bed...) She's big and healthy, not a
lot of hairball issues - I think she just eats too fast. I keep the kibble out
all the time, and split a little can of food between them every day. (I tried
putting away the dry food, but Jumbo just ate faster and barfed again.
*Spewed* all over my leather couch ***Yuck-O***). I'm getting to the point
where I'm beginning to value the mean barfing cat a bit less than my nice new
rug (and new down comforter, could you imagine????) Any advice will be
welcome. What I won't do is take her to the SPCA, because she'd only be scared
and confused for two weeks until they put her to sleep. Can't have that.
Thanks in advance,
Corri
to email, simplify...
"...details delight me, ramifications enchant me, distance no object..."
Lord Peter Wimsey
Amy Gray
2004-10-05 15:05:10 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:16:05 CST, "Dyannalyn"
Post by Dyannalyn
I have the same problem with my 14 year old calico, Pandora -- she is well
fed and healthy, but always eats like she'll never be fed again.
I had the same problem with my male, the solution was to split the
"one" meal into three or four sittings.

Same amount of food, feed him it in four smaller groups spaced a half
hour or so apart.




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Enfilade
2004-10-06 05:25:11 UTC
Permalink
I have four cats. One of them, Kumani, is a barfer. We have taken
her to the vet, tried her on non-allergenic food, and fed her in a
separate room. But she cannot resist the urge to wolf her food and
then, about once a week, has a puke.

We have invested in a good rug-cleaner.

That's about all we can do, as we are not going to split up Kumani and
her sister, and she is really the best-behaved of our 4 when she is
not having tummy upsets. She is in excellent health otherwise, so we
just tidy up the barf and go about our business.

--Fil
Yowie
2004-10-06 07:13:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Enfilade
I have four cats. One of them, Kumani, is a barfer. We have taken
her to the vet, tried her on non-allergenic food, and fed her in a
separate room. But she cannot resist the urge to wolf her food and
then, about once a week, has a puke.
We have invested in a good rug-cleaner.
That's about all we can do, as we are not going to split up Kumani and
her sister, and she is really the best-behaved of our 4 when she is
not having tummy upsets. She is in excellent health otherwise, so we
just tidy up the barf and go about our business.
Try pebbles or even marbles in the kibble that she has to eat around. That
should slow her down some without causing any other issues. Just make sure
you wash them so that the concrete combination of kitty-spit and
kibble-dust[1] doesn't build up too much.

Yowie
[1]Almost as cement-like as the dried bits of leftover breakfast cereal that
went soggy in the milk.
carl
2004-10-09 02:43:27 UTC
Permalink
We have had this problem with several cats.

It appears to be something to do with the cat-biscuits and ageing. I'm not
sure if they overstuff themselves (like dogs do) so they get their fill
before the other cats can pressure them off, or if it's something mental
that goes primal when they get older (the overwhelming need to over eat) or
perhaps just a slower signal of "hey you are fill stop now" that doesn't get
triggered as strongly (Garfield syndrome? :)

It seems to give them stomach (not gut) irritation which forces them to
throw up. Understandably a few throwups puts anyone's stomach (& opening)
under stress, especially such a large dry-ish compound. I wouldn't be
surprised if that makes the problem more likely. (wouldn't be surprised if
they then feel hungry and try to eat again.....)

It -might- be the recipe of the biscuits or water but that doesn't seem to
make any difference.

The only three things which have made a difference are:
1) Stop ad-lib feeding of biscuits because of the gorging.
2) Feed cats individually (in their pecking order - of course) closing the
others out of sight until the sick cat is finished at least
3) As Tiliqua mentioned reduce the sick cats biscuit intake somewhat until
their stomach and oesosaga...esab..throat has time to heal

and possibly (4) watch for strays/food-stealers that raid the bowls and
might upset your cats.
Loading...